Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 202

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Local recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: role of total anatomical dissection

Bokey, E L, Öjerskog, B, Chapuis, P H, Dent, O F, Newland, R C, Sinclair, G·1999·Journal of British Surgery

Abstract

Background: The wide variability of reported local recurrence rates after curative resection of rectal cancer without adjuvant therapy may be a consequence of many different factors. However, few studies have investigated the potential effects of such factors on local recurrence by multivariate analysis. The present study examined clinical and tumour characteristics, operation type and operative technique as potential predictors of local recurrence in patients treated by surgery alone. Methods: Prospective data were analysed by bivariate and multivariate methods including actuarial survival and proportional hazards regression. Results: Local recurrence (pelvic or pelvic and systemic) was diagnosed in 59 of 596 patients. The 5-year actuarial local recurrence rate was 11·1 (95 per cent confidence interval 8·7–14·3) per cent. Independent predictive factors for local recurrence were: positive nodes (hazard ratio (HR) 5·5, P < 0·01); distal margin of 1 cm or less (HR 3·8, P < 0·01); venous invasion (HR 2·0, P = 0·02) and total anatomical dissection of the rectum (HR 2·0, P = 0·01). There was no difference in local recurrence between patients who had the mesorectum divided and those in whom it was totally excised. Conclusion: Nodal involvement is the most potent predictor of local recurrence. In patients in whom total anatomical dissection is performed, total mesorectal excision confers no additional protection against local recurrence.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01216.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 202

Metadata

Authors
Bokey, E. L., Öjerskog, B., Chapuis, P. H., Dent, O. F., Newland, R. C., & Sinclair, G.
Venue
Journal of British Surgery
Published
1999-09-01
Volume
86
Issue
9
Pages
1164-1170
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W2028682591
Cited by
202
References
1
FWCI
3.60
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Local recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: role of total anatomical dissection. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01216.x
The paper
Bokey, E. L., Öjerskog, B., Chapuis, P. H., Dent, O. F., Newland, R. C., & Sinclair, G. (1999). Local recurrence after curative excision of the rectum for cancer without adjuvant therapy: role of total anatomical dissection. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.1999.01216.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.