The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma
Open accessAbstract
Background: The diagnosis and treatment of recurrent gastric cancer remains difficult. The aim of this study was to determine the risk factors for recurrence of gastric cancer and the prognosis for these patients. Methods: Of 2328 patients who underwent curative resection for gastric cancer from 1987 to 1995, 508 whose recurrence was confirmed by clinical examination or reoperation were studied retrospectively. The risk factors that determined the recurrence patterns and timing were investigated by univariate and multivariate analysis. Results: The mean time to recurrence was 21·8 months and peritoneal recurrence was the most frequent (45·9 per cent). Logistic regression analysis showed that serosal invasion and lymph node metastasis were risk factors for all recurrence patterns and early recurrence (at 24 months or less). In addition, independent risk factors involved in each recurrence pattern included younger age, infiltrative or diffuse type, undifferentiated tumour and total gastrectomy for peritoneal recurrence; older age and larger tumour size for disseminated, haematogenous recurrence; and older age, larger tumour size, infiltrative or diffuse type, proximally located tumour and subtotal gastrectomy for locoregional recurrence. Other risk factors for early recurrence were infiltrative or diffuse type and total gastrec-tomy. Reoperation for cure was possible in only 19 patients and the mean survival time after conservative treatment or palliative operation was less than 12 months. Conclusion: The risk factors for each recurrence pattern and timing of gastric cancer can be predicted by the clinicopathological features of the primary tumour. Since the results of treatment remain dismal, studies of perioperative adjuvant therapy in an attempt to reduce recurrence are warranted.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Coccolini, F. (2013) · World Journal of Gastroenterology · doi:10.3748/wjg.v19.i41.6979 · Cited by 325
Okugawa, Y., Toiyama, Y., Hur, K., Toden, S., Saigusa, S., Tanaka, K., Inoue, Y., Mohri, Y., Kusunoki, M., Boland, C. R., et al. (2014) · Carcinogenesis · doi:10.1093/carcin/bgu200 · Cited by 213
Sun, H., Huang, X., Wang, Z., Zhang, G., Mei, Y., Wang, Y., Nie, Z., & Wang, S. (2019) · Journal of Cancer · doi:10.7150/jca.35939 · Cited by 38
Metadata
- Authors
- Yoo, C. H., Noh, S. H., Shin, D. W., Choi, S. H., & Min, J. S.
- Venue
- Journal of British Surgery
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-02-01
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 236-242
- ISSN
- 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2168
- OpenAlex
- W2105423180
- Cited by
- 736
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 10.59
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01360.x
- The paper
- Yoo, C. H., Noh, S. H., Shin, D. W., Choi, S. H., & Min, J. S. (2000). Recurrence following curative resection for gastric carcinoma. Journal of British Surgery. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2168.2000.01360.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.