Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 272

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Chronic pain after laparoscopic and open mesh repair of groin hernia

Kumar, S, Wilson, R G, Nixon, S J, Macintyre, I M C·2002·British Journal of Surgery

Abstract

Background: The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic pain or discomfort after laparoscopic totally extraperitoneal (TEP) repair and open mesh repair of groin hernia, and to assess the impact of such pain on patients' physical activity. Methods: A postal questionnaire was sent to patients who had TEP or open mesh repair of groin hernia between January 1998 and December 1999. The patients were asked about any persistent pain or discomfort in relation to the groin hernia repair and whether this pain or discomfort restricted their ability to undertake physical or sporting activity. Results: Of the 560 available patients 454 (81·1 per cent) replied. Laparoscopic TEP repair was performed in 240 patients (52·9 per cent) and open mesh repair in 214 (47·1 per cent). Of the 454 patients, 136 (30·0 per cent) reported chronic groin pain or discomfort, which was significantly more common after open repair than after laparoscopic repair (38·3 versus 22·5 per cent; P < 0·01). Chronic groin pain or discomfort restricted daily physical or sporting activity in 18·1 per cent of the patients. The patients who had open repair complained of significantly more restriction of daily physical activity than patients who underwent laparoscopic repair (walking, P < 0·05; lifting a bag of groceries, P < 0·01). Conclusion: Chronic pain or discomfort was reported by 30·0 per cent of patients after groin hernia repair and was significantly more common after open mesh repair than after laparoscopic TEP repair. It restricted physical or sporting activities in 18·1 per cent of the patients and significantly more so after open mesh repair.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2168.2002.02260.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

Metadata

Authors
Kumar, S., Wilson, R. G., Nixon, S. J., & Macintyre, I. M. C.
Venue
British Journal of Surgery
Published
2002-11
Volume
89
Issue
11
Pages
1476-1479
ISSN
  • 0007-1323 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2168
OpenAlex
W1969330752
Cited by
272
References
0
FWCI
9.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.