The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species
Open accessAbstract
Background: Cow's milk allergy is quite frequent in the first years of human life. When breast‐feeding is not possible, a cow's milk substitute must be provided for allergic subjects. Different alternatives to cow's milk have been suggested as protein sources (soy, hydrolysed proteins, goat's milk, etc.), but all these dietetic solutions are not without risks for polyallergic or more sensitive subjects. Objective: To obtain new information on the suitability of other mammalian milks for allergic children, we evaluated the cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Methods: Milk samples were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). To detect antibody–antigen complexes, immunoblotting was performed by using sera from children allergic to cow's and ewe's milk (RAST class ≥ 4) and monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) specific for bovine proteins (caseins and β‐lactoglobulin). Results: IgEs from children allergic to cow's milk are capable of recognizing most part of milk proteins from mammals bred in European countries (ewe, goat, buffalo), while no serum used in this study contains IgEs reacting with camel's milk proteins. Camel's milk was also not recognized from circulating IgEs from a child specifically allergic to ewe's milk. Specific antibovine monoclonal antibodies cross‐reacted with proteins from other mammalian species, apart from those of camel. Conclusions: Homologies in amino acidic composition could justify the cross‐reactivity observed between proteins from different animal species. On the other hand, the phylogenetic difference could be responsible for the failed recognition of camel's proteins by circulating IgEs and monoclonal antibodies.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
EAACI Molecular Allergology User's Guide
Matricardi, P. M., Kleine‐Tebbe, J., Hoffmann, H. J., Valenta, R., Hilger, C., Hofmaier, S., Aalberse, R. C., Agache, I., Asero, R., Ballmer‐Weber, B., et al. (2016) · Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1111/pai.12563 · Cited by 932
Panel), E. P. O. G. M. O. (. (2010) · EFSA Journal · doi:10.2903/j.efsa.2010.1700 · Cited by 608
(2010) · Pediatric Allergy and Immunology · doi:10.1111/j.1399-3038.2010.01068.x · Cited by 425
Composition, Structure, and Digestive Dynamics of Milk From Different Species—A Review
Roy, D., Ye, A., Moughan, P. J., & Singh, H. (2020) · Frontiers in Nutrition · doi:10.3389/fnut.2020.577759 · Cited by 361
The challenge of cow milk protein allergy
El-Agamy, E. I. (2007) · Small Ruminant Research · doi:10.1016/j.smallrumres.2006.09.016 · Cited by 317
Metadata
- Authors
- RESTANI, GAIASCHI, PLEBANI, BERETTA, CAVAGNI, FIOCCHI, POIESI, VELONÀ, UGAZIO, & GALLI
- Venue
- Clinical & Experimental Allergy
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-07
- Volume
- 29
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 997-1004
- ISSN
- 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2222
- OpenAlex
- W2085763743
- Cited by
- 193
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 1.34
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00563.x
- The paper
- RESTANI, GAIASCHI, PLEBANI, BERETTA, CAVAGNI, FIOCCHI, POIESI, VELONÀ, UGAZIO, & GALLI. (1999). Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00563.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.