Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 193

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species

Open access
RESTANI, GAIASCHI, PLEBANI, BERETTA, CAVAGNI, FIOCCHI, POIESI, VELONÀ, UGAZIO, GALLI·1999·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Background: Cow's milk allergy is quite frequent in the first years of human life. When breast‐feeding is not possible, a cow's milk substitute must be provided for allergic subjects. Different alternatives to cow's milk have been suggested as protein sources (soy, hydrolysed proteins, goat's milk, etc.), but all these dietetic solutions are not without risks for polyallergic or more sensitive subjects. Objective: To obtain new information on the suitability of other mammalian milks for allergic children, we evaluated the cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Methods: Milk samples were analysed by sodium dodecyl sulphate polyacrylamide gel electrophoresis (SDS‐PAGE). To detect antibody–antigen complexes, immunoblotting was performed by using sera from children allergic to cow's and ewe's milk (RAST class ≥ 4) and monoclonal antibodies (MoAb) specific for bovine proteins (caseins and β‐lactoglobulin). Results: IgEs from children allergic to cow's milk are capable of recognizing most part of milk proteins from mammals bred in European countries (ewe, goat, buffalo), while no serum used in this study contains IgEs reacting with camel's milk proteins. Camel's milk was also not recognized from circulating IgEs from a child specifically allergic to ewe's milk. Specific antibovine monoclonal antibodies cross‐reacted with proteins from other mammalian species, apart from those of camel. Conclusions: Homologies in amino acidic composition could justify the cross‐reactivity observed between proteins from different animal species. On the other hand, the phylogenetic difference could be responsible for the failed recognition of camel's proteins by circulating IgEs and monoclonal antibodies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00563.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 193

Metadata

Authors
RESTANI, GAIASCHI, PLEBANI, BERETTA, CAVAGNI, FIOCCHI, POIESI, VELONÀ, UGAZIO, & GALLI
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-07
Volume
29
Issue
7
Pages
997-1004
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2085763743
Cited by
193
References
0
FWCI
1.34
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00563.x
The paper
RESTANI, GAIASCHI, PLEBANI, BERETTA, CAVAGNI, FIOCCHI, POIESI, VELONÀ, UGAZIO, & GALLI. (1999). Cross‐reactivity between milk proteins from different animal species. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.1999.00563.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.