Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 974

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema

Isolauri, E., Arvola, T., SÜtas, Y., Moilanen, E., Salminen, S.·2000·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Background: Over the last two decades the incidence of allergic diseases has increased in industrialized countries, and consequently new approaches have to be explored. Objective: The potential of probiotics to control allergic inflammation at an early age was assessed in a randomized double‐blind placebo‐controlled study. Methods: A total of 27 infants, mean age 4.6 months, who manifested atopic eczema during exclusive breast‐feeding and who have had no exposure to any infant or substitute formula were weaned to probiotic‐supplemented, Bifidobacterium lactis Bb‐12 or Lactobacillus strain GG (ATCC 53103), extensively hydrolysed whey formulas or to the same formula without probiotics. The extent and severity of atopic eczema, the growth and nutrition of infants, and concentrations of circulating cytokines/chemokines and soluble cell surface adhesion molecules in serum and methyl‐histamine and eosinophilic protein X in urine were determined. Results: The SCORAD score reflecting the extent and severity of atopic eczema was 16 (7–25) during breast‐feeding, median (interquartile range). After 2 months, a significant improvement in skin condition occurred in patients given probiotic‐supplemented formulas, as compared to the unsupplemented group; χ 2 = 12.27, P = 0.002. SCORAD decreased in the Bifidobacterium lactis Bb‐12 group to 0 (0–3.8), and in the Lactobacillus GG group to 1 (0.1–8.7), vs unsupplemented 13.4 (4.5–18.2), median (interquartile range), in parallel with a reduction in the concentration of soluble CD4 in serum and eosinophilic protein X in urine. Conclusion: The results provide the first clinical demonstration of specific probiotic strains modifying the changes related to allergic inflammation. The data further indicate that probiotics may counteract inflammatory responses beyond the intestinal milieu. The combined effects of these probiotic strains will guide infants through the weaning period, when sensitization to newly encountered antigens is initiated. The probiotic approach may thus offer a new direction in the search for future foods for allergy treatment and prevention strategies.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00943.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 974

Metadata

Authors
Isolauri, E., Arvola, T., SÜtas, Y., Moilanen, E., & Salminen, S.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-11
Volume
30
Issue
11
Pages
1605-1610
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2129001596
Cited by
974
References
2
FWCI
66.76
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00943.x
The paper
Isolauri, E., Arvola, T., SÜtas, Y., Moilanen, E., & Salminen, S. (2000). Probiotics in the management of atopic eczema. Clinical & Experimental Allergy. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2222.2000.00943.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.