Cited by 74Drug-Induced Adverse ReactionsContact Dermatitis and AllergiesDermatology and Skin Diseases

Determination of interleukin‐5 secretion from drug‐specific activated ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells as a test system for the in vitro detection of drug sensitization

Sachs, B., Erdmann, S., Malte Baron, J., Neis, M., Al Masaoudi, T., Merk, H. F.·2002·Clinical & Experimental Allergy

Abstract

Summary: Background In vitro detection of drug sensitization is still limited. The lymphocyte transformation test, which determines drug‐specific proliferation, is the only in vitro test for detecting drug sensitization at the cellular level irrespective of the reaction's clinical phenotype. Accumulation of eosinophils following IL‐5 secretion from drug‐specific stimulated T cells is a characteristic histological feature of drug‐induced skin eruptions. Objective We determined whether in vitro drug‐specific activation of ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells from 10 patients with drug‐induced maculopapular exanthems and three patients with severe skin reactions results in secretion of IL‐5, IL‐10 or IFN‐γ and assessed the sensitivity and specificity of drug‐specific IL‐5 secretion as a test system compared with the lymphocyte transformation test and patch tests. Furthermore, the subsets of CD4+ and CD8+ T cells involved in drug‐specific proliferation, IL‐5 secretion and mRNA expression were examined in three patients. Methods Drug‐specific proliferation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells in the lymphocyte transformation test was investigated by 3 H‐thymidine uptake, and culture supernatants taken after 5 days were analysed for IL‐5, IL‐10 and IFN‐γ concentrations by ELISA technique. IL‐5 mRNA expression was determined by RT‐PCR. Results Drug‐specific activation of peripheral blood mononuclear cells consistently resulted in IL‐5 and to a lesser extent in IL‐10 and IFN‐γ secretion. The sensitivities of the patch test, lymphocyte transformation test and assessment of drug‐specific IL‐5 secretion for the detection of drug sensitization were 55%, 75% and 92%, respectively. Conclusion These data suggest a role for the determination of drug‐specific IL‐5 secretion by ex vivo peripheral blood mononuclear cells for the in vitro detection of drug‐sensitization in drug‐induced maculopapular exanthems.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2222.2002.01382.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Sachs, B., Erdmann, S., Malte Baron, J., Neis, M., Al Masaoudi, T., & Merk, H. F.
Affiliations
RWTH Aachen University (DE)
Corresponding author
Sachs, B.
Venue
Clinical & Experimental Allergy
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05
Volume
32
Issue
5
Pages
736-744
ISSN
  • 0954-7894 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2222
OpenAlex
W2049905664
Cited by
74
References
0
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2023: 3 · 2022: 4 · 2021: 5 · 2020: 5 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 3 · 2012: 1
FWCI
1.61
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical & Experimental Allergy (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • RWTH Publications (RWTH Aachen) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Pharmacology › Drug-Induced Adverse Reactions
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Contact Dermatitis and Allergies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Dermatology › Dermatology and Skin Diseases
Keywords
drug sensitization, IL-5, drug-induced skin reaction, lymphocyte transformation test, patch testing, IL-10, interferon-gamma, eosinophil accumulation, CD4+ T cells, CD8+ T cells, IL-5 mRNA expression
MeSH terms
Adult, Epitopes, Cell Division, Child, Drug Hypersensitivity, Female, Humans, Immunization, Interferon-gamma, Male, Middle Aged, Monocytes, RNA, Messenger, Time, CD4-Positive T-Lymphocytes, Interleukin-5, Interleukin-10, CD8-Positive T-Lymphocytes

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review