Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 181

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Isolation and phenotypic characterization of colonic macrophages

Open access
Rogler, G, Hausmann, M, Vogl, D, Aschenbrenner, E, Andus, T, Falk, W, Andreesen, R, Schölmerich, J, Gross, V·2001·Clinical and Experimental Immunology

Abstract

SUMMARY: Macrophages play an important role in the intestinal mucosal immune system. However, they are a poorly defined cell population. We therefore determined their phenotype in normal colonic mucosa. Macrophages were isolated from colonic biopsies and surgical specimens by collagenase digestion. Colonic macrophages were positively sorted by anti-CD33 magnetic beads. Flow cytometric triple fluorescence analysis was applied to study CD14, CD16, CD33, CD44, CD11b, CD11c, CD64, HLA-DR, CD80, CD86 and CD3/CD19 expression. CD33 was evaluated as a positive marker for intestinal macrophages. CD33+ cells isolated from normal colonic mucosa showed co-expression of the established intracellular macrophage marker CD68 in FACS analysis. CD33+ cells were capable of phagocytosis. Isolation of this cell population by magnetic anti-CD33 beads and culture resulted in a 4·2–40-fold increase in IL-1β and 4·5–44-fold increase in tumour necrosis factor-alpha (TNF-α) secretion compared with unsorted lamina propria mononuclear cells (LPMC). Of the CD33+ cells, 90·9 ± 6·9% (mean ± s.d.) were CD44+. However, macrophages from colonic mucosa showed only a low expression of CD14 (10·5 ± 3·8%), CD16 (10·1 ± 3·9%), HLA-DR (27·3 ± 9·2%), CD11b (17·4 ± 6·8%), CD11c (17·8 ± 10·4%). Furthermore, expression of CD80 (9·2 ± 4·2%) and CD86 (15·1 ± 7·3%) was low, suggesting a low ability of normal intestinal macrophages to activate T cells and T cell-mediated immune responses. We conclude that CD33 is useful for the isolation and flow cytometric characterization of colonic macrophages. These cells exhibit a single phenotype in normal mucosa (CD33++, CD44++, CD14−, CD16−, CD11b−, CD11c−, HLA-DRlow, CD80−, CD86−) lacking lipopolysaccharide (LPS) receptor and costimulatory molecules.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00557.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 181

Metadata

Authors
Rogler, G., Hausmann, M., Vogl, D., Aschenbrenner, E., Andus, T., Falk, W., Andreesen, R., Schölmerich, J., & Gross, V
Venue
Clinical and Experimental Immunology
Published
1998-05
Volume
112
Issue
2
Pages
205-215
ISSN
  • 0009-9104 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2249
OpenAlex
W2011749939
Cited by
181
References
0
FWCI
1.31
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Isolation and phenotypic characterization of colonic macrophages. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00557.x
The paper
Rogler, G., Hausmann, M., Vogl, D., Aschenbrenner, E., Andus, T., Falk, W., Andreesen, R., Schölmerich, J., & Gross, V. (2001). Isolation and phenotypic characterization of colonic macrophages. Clinical and Experimental Immunology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2249.1998.00557.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.