The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Comparison of blood counts in venous, fingertip and arterial blood and their measurement variation: Comparison of venous, fingertip and arterial blood counts
Open accessAbstract
We compared routine blood pictures in venous, fingertip and arterial blood and their measurement variation. A pair of venous and fingertip blood samples were simultaneously collected from 24 volunteers, and another pair of venous and arterial samples from another 12 volunteers. The volunteers were healthy adults, aged 20-22 years, with males and females in equal numbers. Three aliquots of blood were taken from each person for three measurements of blood counts, including haemoglobin concentration and haematocrit, using an automatic haematology analyser. Compared to arterial blood, there was a significant increase of erythrocyte count (2.7%) and haematocrit (3.1%) in the venous blood. The total and large leucocyte counts were significantly higher (9.2% and 12.6%, respectively) in the fingertip blood than in the venous blood. There were a decreasing number of leucocytes in the fingertip blood with repeated sampling. The intermeasurement variation for total leucocyte or haemoglobin measurement was significantly larger as measured with the fingertip blood or arterial blood than with the venous blood. The intermeasurement coefficients of variation of haemoglobin (1.3%) and small leucocyte ratio or platelet (approximately 4.0%) measurements with venous and arterial blood were the smallest and largest, respectively. Volume of arterial plasma was diminished by 2-3% after microcirculation. Elevation of total leucocyte count in the fingertip blood was mainly due to the increase of granulocytes. Measurement with venous blood was of better precision than with fingertip or arterial blood.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Biospecimen Reporting for Improved Study Quality (BRISQ)
Moore, H. M., Kelly, A. B., Jewell, S. D., McShane, L. M., Clark, D. P., Greenspan, R., Hayes, D. F., Hainaut, P., Kim, P., Mansfield, E., et al. (2011) · Journal of Proteome Research · doi:10.1021/pr200021n · Cited by 337
HbA1c-testing: Evaluation of two point-of-care analysers
Dubach, I. L., Christ, E. R., & Diem, P. (2019) · Primary Care Diabetes · doi:10.1016/j.pcd.2019.05.007 · Cited by 9
Metadata
- Authors
- Yang, Z.-W., Yang, S.-H., Chen, L., Qu, J., Zhu, J., & Tang, Z.
- Venue
- Clinical & Laboratory Haematology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-06-11
- Volume
- 23
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 155-159
- ISSN
- 0141-9854 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2004497443
- Cited by
- 158
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 0.00
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Comparison of blood counts in venous, fingertip and arterial blood and their measurement variation: Comparison of venous, fingertip and arterial blood counts. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2257.2001.00388.x
- The paper
- Yang, Z.-W., Yang, S.-H., Chen, L., Qu, J., Zhu, J., & Tang, Z. (2001). Comparison of blood counts in venous, fingertip and arterial blood and their measurement variation: Comparison of venous, fingertip and arterial blood counts. Clinical & Laboratory Haematology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2257.2001.00388.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.