Cited by 203Hormonal and reproductive studiesAdrenal Hormones and DisordersMenopause: Health Impacts and Treatments

Construction and field validation of a self‐administered screener for testosterone deficiency (hypogonadism) in ageing men

Smith, Kevin W., Feldman, Henry A., McKinlay, John B.·2000·Clinical Endocrinology

Abstract

To design a self‐administered screening questionnaire to inform men about their risk for testosterone deficiency. The screener was developed in two phases. First was a construction phase in which relevant risk factors and a scoring algorithm were defined from multiple logistic regression analyses of survey data. In the second phase, the screener's accuracy (based on sensitivity, specificity, and Receiver Operating Characteristic (ROC) curves) was tested using patients from a primary care clinic. All subjects provided blood samples for endocrine testing. Survey data from 1660 men aged 40–79 years participating in the Massachusetts Male Ageing Study (MMAS) were analysed in the first phase. The clinic sample consisted of 304 men aged 40–79 years presenting at a large Massachusetts primary health care clinic for routine check‐ups or minor medical problems. The primary outcome was testosterone deficiency, defined as serum total testosterone below 12·1 nmol/l. Self‐reported variables considered as potential risk factors included age, obesity, chronic diseases, health behaviour, the Jackson dominance scale, and symptoms of stress. The prevalence of testosterone deficiency was 20·4% in the MMAS and 42·1% in the clinic sample. An eight‐item screener was developed based on age, body mass index, diabetes, asthma, headaches, sleep patterns, dominance preferences, and smoking status. The screener performed significantly better than chance in identifying men with low testosterone levels; the area under the ROC curve was 0·66 in the MMAS sample and 0·67 in the clinic sample. The self‐scored screener developed in this study reliably detects men at risk of hypogonadism. The screener encourages at risk men to seek professional evaluation of their testosterone levels.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2265.2000.01152.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet

References 25 · Cited by 203

Authors
Smith, K. W., Feldman, H. A., & McKinlay, J. B.
Affiliations
New England Research Institutes (US)
Corresponding author
Smith, Kevin W.
Venue
Clinical Endocrinology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-12-19
Volume
53
Issue
6
Pages
703-711
ISSN
  • 0300-0664 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2265
OpenAlex
W2065662763
Cited by
203
References
25
Citations by year
2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 6 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 3 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 4 · 2016: 7 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
FWCI
6.07
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Clinical Endocrinology (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • National Institutes of Health (7p01ag004673-05)
  • National Institute on Aging (AG 04673)
  • National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (R01DK044995, DK44995)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Hormonal and reproductive studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Adrenal Hormones and Disorders
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism › Menopause: Health Impacts and Treatments
Keywords
androgen deficiency, hypogonadism, older men, risk factors, screening accuracy, primary care, serum total testosterone, obesity, diabetes mellitus, smoking, stress symptoms
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Algorithms, Asthma, Headache, Humans, Hypogonadism, Male, Mass Screening, Middle Aged, Obesity, Predictive Value of Tests, Surveys and Questionnaires, Risk Factors, ROC Curve, Sleep Wake Disorders, Smoking, Stress, Psychological, Testosterone, Prevalence, Logistic Models, Diabetes Complications

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review