Potential changes in skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ) habitat from a global warming scenario: modelling approach and preliminary results
Abstract
Recent studies suggest a reduction of primary production in the tropical oceans because of changes in oceanic circulation under global warming conditions caused by increasing atmospheric CO 2 concentration. This might affect the productivity of medium and higher trophic levels with potential consequences on marine resources such as tropical tuna. Here we combine the projections of up‐to‐date climate and ocean biogeochemical models with recent concepts of representation of fish habitat based on prey abundance and ambient temperature to gain some insight into the impact of climate change on skipjack tuna ( Katsuwonus pelamis ), the species that dominates present‐day tuna catch. For a world with doubled atmospheric CO 2 concentration, our results suggest significant large‐scale changes of skipjack habitat in the equatorial Pacific. East of the date line, conditions could be improved by an extension of the present favourable habitat zones of the western equatorial Pacific, a feature reminiscent of warming conditions associated with El Niño events. Despite its simplicity and the associated underlying hypothesis, this first simulation is used to stress future research directions and key issues for modelling developments associated to global change.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Significant large scale changes of skipjack habitat in the equatorial Pacific are suggested to occur due to increased ocean temperature caused by global warming.
“Loukos et al. (2003) suggested significant large scale changes of skipjack habitat in the equatorial Pacific due to increased ocean temperature caused by global warming.”
From El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO) impact on tuna fisheries in Indian Ocean (2014) · cites this paper as Loukos et al. 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 33 · Cited by 72
- Authors
- Loukos, H., Monfray, P., Bopp, L., & Lehodey, P.
- Affiliations
- Institut Pierre-Simon Laplace (FR)
- Pacific Community (NC)
- Corresponding author
- Monfray, Patrick
- Venue
- Fisheries Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 474-482
- ISSN
- 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2419
- OpenAlex
- W2078860671
- Cited by
- 72
- References
- 33
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 4 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 3 · 2020: 3 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 2.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Ecological Modeling › Species Distribution and Climate Change
- Keywords
- skipjack tuna, climate change impacts, fish habitat, ocean warming, CO2 doubling, prey abundance, ambient temperature, equatorial Pacific, El Niño, ocean biogeochemical models, tropical tuna fisheries
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review