Environmental ‘loopholes’ and fish population dynamics: comparative pattern recognition with focus on El Niño effects in the Pacific
Abstract
A process of comparative pattern recognition is undertaken for the purpose of garnering insights into the mechanisms underlying some currently puzzling conundrums in fishery resource ecology. These include (a) out‐of‐phase oscillations between anchovies and sardines, (b) the remarkable fish productivity of the Peru–Humboldt marine ecosystem, (c) sardine population increases in the eastern Pacific during El Niños, (d) basin‐wide synchronies in large‐amplitude abundance variations, (e) characteristic spawning of large tuna species in poorly productive areas, (f) contrary trends in Pacific tropical tuna abundance during the 1970s and early 1980s. It is found that each of the items appears to become less enigmatic when the conceptual focus shifts from conventional trophodynamics to the idea that ‘loopholes’ in the fields of biological controls (i.e. of predators of early life stages), produced by poor ocean productivity or by disruptive environmental perturbations, may in fact lead to remarkable reproductive success. Implications include the following: (1) El Niño, rather than being an unmitigated disaster for Peruvian fisheries, may in the long run be a prime reason for the remarkable fishery productivity of the Peru–Humboldt large marine ecosystem. (2) Globally‐teleconnected climatic trends or shifts might produce globally‐coherent population expansions even when local environmental expressions may be quite different. (3) It may be unreasonable to expect any management methodol…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Sardine is generally more environmentally flexible than anchovy.
“and to be generally more environmentally flexible than anchovy (Bakun and Broad, 2003).”
From Modelling potential spawning habitat of sardine ( <i>Sardina pilchardus</i> ) and anchovy ( <i>Engraulis encrasicolus</i> ) in the Bay of Biscay (2007) · cites this paper as Bakun and Broad, 2003
There would be low food availability and, consequently, low predator abundances, as suggested by the loophole hypothesis.
“Thus, there would be low food availability and, consequently, low predator abundances, as suggested by the socalled 'loophole hypothesis ' (Bakun & Broad 2003, Irigoien et al. 2007).”
From Worldwide distributions of tuna larvae: revisiting hypotheses on environmental requirements for spawning habitats (2014) · cites this paper as Bakun & Broad 2003
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 64 · Cited by 267
- Authors
- Bakun, A., & Broad, K.
- Affiliations
- University of Miami (US)
- Corresponding author
- Bakun, Andrew
- Venue
- Fisheries Oceanography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-09
- Volume
- 12
- Issue
- 4-5
- Pages
- 458-473
- ISSN
- 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2419
- OpenAlex
- W2116509891
- Cited by
- 267
- References
- 64
- Citations by year
- 2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
- FWCI
- 9.56
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
- Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
- Keywords
- fish population dynamics, El Niño, anchovy, sardine, fishery productivity, ocean productivity, climate variability, fisheries management
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review