Cited by 267Marine and fisheries researchFish Ecology and Management StudiesMathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models

Environmental ‘loopholes’ and fish population dynamics: comparative pattern recognition with focus on El Niño effects in the Pacific

Bakun, Andrew, Broad, Kenneth·2003·Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract

A process of comparative pattern recognition is undertaken for the purpose of garnering insights into the mechanisms underlying some currently puzzling conundrums in fishery resource ecology. These include (a) out‐of‐phase oscillations between anchovies and sardines, (b) the remarkable fish productivity of the Peru–Humboldt marine ecosystem, (c) sardine population increases in the eastern Pacific during El Niños, (d) basin‐wide synchronies in large‐amplitude abundance variations, (e) characteristic spawning of large tuna species in poorly productive areas, (f) contrary trends in Pacific tropical tuna abundance during the 1970s and early 1980s. It is found that each of the items appears to become less enigmatic when the conceptual focus shifts from conventional trophodynamics to the idea that ‘loopholes’ in the fields of biological controls (i.e. of predators of early life stages), produced by poor ocean productivity or by disruptive environmental perturbations, may in fact lead to remarkable reproductive success. Implications include the following: (1) El Niño, rather than being an unmitigated disaster for Peruvian fisheries, may in the long run be a prime reason for the remarkable fishery productivity of the Peru–Humboldt large marine ecosystem. (2) Globally‐teleconnected climatic trends or shifts might produce globally‐coherent population expansions even when local environmental expressions may be quite different. (3) It may be unreasonable to expect any management methodol…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00258.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

No citation lists for this paper

No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.

References 64 · Cited by 267

Authors
Bakun, A., & Broad, K.
Affiliations
University of Miami (US)
Corresponding author
Bakun, Andrew
Venue
Fisheries Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
12
Issue
4-5
Pages
458-473
ISSN
  • 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2419
OpenAlex
W2116509891
Cited by
267
References
64
Citations by year
2026: 3 · 2025: 9 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 9 · 2021: 12 · 2020: 14 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 15 · 2017: 12 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 7 · 2014: 12 · 2013: 20 · 2012: 22
FWCI
9.56
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Mathematical and Theoretical Epidemiology and Ecology Models
Keywords
fish population dynamics, El Niño, anchovy, sardine, fishery productivity, ocean productivity, climate variability, fisheries management

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review