Cited by 32Marine and fisheries researchOceanographic and Atmospheric ProcessesFish Ecology and Management Studies

Modelling the vertical distribution of eggs of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus)

Boyra, G., Rueda, L., Coombs, S.H., Sundby, S., Ådlandsvik, B., Santos, M., Uriarte, A.·2003·Fisheries Oceanography

Abstract

Understanding and modelling the vertical distribution of fish eggs in the water column is a major challenge for future use of underway‐continuous egg samplers as estimators of the total egg abundance. This study presents modelling of field data of anchovy (Engraulis encrasicolus) and sardine (Sardina pilchardus) egg vertical distribution obtained from LHPR sampling in the Bay of Biscay. Starting from Sundby's model [Deep‐Sea Res.30 (1983) 645], improvements were achieved through successive modifications concerning egg buoyancy and vertical propagation of wind‐induced turbulence. In addition, measurements of egg settling velocity and buoyancy by stages were included as inputs for the model. The best model fitting was achieved through the adoption of a gradual turbulence vertical decay model (proportional to the inverse of the water density profile), a Gaussian variability of egg density and adaptability of the egg density to the surrounding water by means of permeability of the chorion. This led to improvements over the Sundby original model. The coefficient of determination (R2) of the modelled egg abundance profiles compared with the observed ones was around 80% for both sardine and anchovy. The model described successfully the vertical distribution of eggs for waters of high surface salinity (R2 of almost 90%), but less so for waters of low surface salinity (R2 of about 70%).

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2419.2003.00260.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Authors
Boyra, G., Rueda, L., Coombs, S. H., Sundby, S., Ådlandsvik, B., Santos, M., & Uriarte, A.
Affiliations
  • AZTI (ES)
  • Marine Biological Association of the United Kingdom (GB)
  • Norwegian Institute of Marine Research (NO)
Corresponding author
Boyra, G.
Venue
Fisheries Oceanography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2003-09
Volume
12
Issue
4-5
Pages
381-395
ISSN
  • 1054-6006 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2419
OpenAlex
W1999353461
Cited by
32
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2020: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 3
FWCI
3.90
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Fisheries Oceanography (publishedVersion)
  • Marine Biological Association (acceptedVersion)
Funders
European Commission
Topics
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Global and Planetary Change › Marine and fisheries research
  • Physical Sciences › Earth and Planetary Sciences › Oceanography › Oceanographic and Atmospheric Processes
  • Physical Sciences › Environmental Science › Nature and Landscape Conservation › Fish Ecology and Management Studies
Keywords
anchovy eggs, sardine eggs, Engraulis encrasicolus, Sardina pilchardus, egg buoyancy, wind-induced turbulence, egg density, Bay of Biscay, surface salinity

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review