The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near‐bed flow in lowland streams
Abstract
1. Submerged macrophytes have important physical and structural effects on lowland streams. This study investigated the ability of submerged macrophytes to modify the near‐bed flow and to retain mineral and organic particles in patches of four common macrophytes in shallow Danish streams during mid‐summer. 2. In dense patches of Callitriche cophocarpa and Elodea canadensis, where near‐bed velocity was reduced, the sediment surface was markedly raised and enriched with fine particles. In dense patches of Ranunculus peltatus, fine sediments were deposited among rooted shoots in the upstream part of the patches, while erosion and coarse sediments prevailed in the downstream part of the patches because of the strong vortices that formed at the rear and moved up under the trailing canopy. The open canopy of Sparganium emersum, with its streamlined leaves, had little effect on flow and sediment. 3. Patterns of sediment deposition and composition were closely related to the morphology and canopy structure of plant species and the presence of low velocity above the sediment among the rooted shoots. The mineral particles retained probably originate from bed‐load, and the enrichment with finer particles within the patches probably results mainly from size‐selective processes during erosion and transport of particles rather than during deposition. The mixed sediment composition within patches suggests that the flow‐resistant shoots generate an environment conducive to deposition of all transported particles. 4. Fine sediments within macrophyte beds contained high concentrations of organic matter, carbon, nitrogen and phosphorus. The wide scatter in the relationships between mineral grain size and the content of organic matter and nutrients reflects the spatial and temporal complexity of erosion, transport and sedimentation of mineral and organic particles. 5. Enrichment of sediment within macrophyte beds relative to the surrounding substratum ranged from 780 g organic matter m–2, 30 g N m–2 and 25 g P m–2 for the flow‐resistant dense canopies af Callitriche cophocarpa to 150 g organic matter m–2, 6.6 g N m–2 and 3.4 g P m–2 for the open canopies of Sparganium emersum. Retention of nutrient‐rich particles within the macrophyte beds is probably of limited importance for plant growth in most lowland European streams, because macrophyte growth is rarely nutrient limited.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Retention time and dispersion associated with submerged aquatic canopies
Nepf, H., Ghisalberti, M., White, B., & Murphy, E. (2007) · Water Resources Research · doi:10.1029/2006wr005362 · Cited by 332
Andersen, M. R., Sand-Jensen, K., Iestyn Woolway, R., & Jones, I. D. (2017) · Aquatic Sciences · doi:10.1007/s00027-016-0505-0 · Cited by 76
Self-citationBenelli, S., & Bartoli, M. (2021) · Limnology and Oceanography Letters · doi:10.1002/lol2.10207 · Cited by 31
Metadata
- Authors
- Sand‐jensen, K.
- Venue
- Freshwater Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-06
- Volume
- 39
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 663-679
- ISSN
- 0046-5070 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2427
- OpenAlex
- W2065694080
- Cited by
- 416
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near‐bed flow in lowland streams. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00316.x
- The paper
- Sand‐jensen, K. (1998). Influence of submerged macrophytes on sediment composition and near‐bed flow in lowland streams. Freshwater Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2427.1998.00316.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.