Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 969

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions

PINNEGAR, J. K., POLUNIN, N. V. C.·1999·Functional Ecology

Abstract

1. Stable isotopes of nitrogen and carbon are widely used in the evaluation and understanding of trophic interactions, and especially so in aquatic food‐webs. However, differences among tissues which occur in consumers such as fish may confound resolution of these ecological relationships, and greatly affect dietary compositions calculated through mass‐balance equations. 2.δ 13 C and δ 15 N were determined for homogenized whole fry (≈ 2·7 g) and particular tissues (white muscle, red muscle, liver and heart) of juveniles (≈ 20·6 g) of Rainbow Trout Oncorhynchus mykiss. 3. Differences in δ 13 C and δ 15 N were observed among tissues; removal of lipid resulted in these tissues becoming statistically indistinguishable but more variable in δ 13 C, particularly in tissues with higher lipid content. Differences in δ 15 N among tissues may be related to the relative composition of ‘essential’ and ‘non‐essential’ amino acids. 5. Acidification, which is used to reduce variability caused by the presence of inorganic carbonate, had a significant effect on δ 15 N, while having a non‐significant effect on the δ 13 C. This was the case for whole ground fish‐fry, which contained 22·6% inorganic carbonates in the form of bones and scales, and for individual fish tissues which contained only very small amounts of inorganic carbonate. 6. White muscle was found to be less variable in δ 13 C and δ 15 N than all other tissues, and is probably the best tissue for use in ecological work. Red muscle, which is often closely associated with white muscle, is more variable in δ 13 C and may constitute a source of significant error in source material identification and dietary overlap.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00301.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 969

Metadata

Authors
PINNEGAR, J. K., & POLUNIN, N. V. C.
Venue
Functional Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-04
Volume
13
Issue
2
Pages
225-231
ISSN
  • 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2435
OpenAlex
W1970183529
Cited by
969
References
2
FWCI
9.12
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00301.x
The paper
PINNEGAR, J. K., & POLUNIN, N. V. C. (1999). Differential fractionation of δ13C and δ15N among fish tissues: implications for the study of trophic interactions. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.1999.00301.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.