The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effect of tree height and light availability on photosynthetic leaf traits of four neotropical species differing in shade tolerance
Open accessAbstract
1. Light‐saturated rate of photosynthesis (Amax), nitrogen (N), chlorophyll (Chl) content and leaf mass per unit area (LMA) were measured in leaves of trees of different heights along a natural light gradient in a French Guiana rain forest. The following four species, arranged in order from most shade‐tolerant to pioneer, were studied:Duguetia surinamensis, Vouacapoua americana, Dicorynia guianensis and Goupia glabra. Light availability of trees was estimated using hemispherical photography. 2. The pioneer species Goupia had the lowest LMA and leaf N on both an area and mass basis, whereas Duguetia had the highest values. In general, leaf variables of Vouacapoua and Dicorynia tended to be intermediates. Because Amax/area was similar among species,Goupia showed both a much higher light‐saturated photosynthetic nitrogen‐use efficiency (PNUE max) and Amax/mass. Leaves of Vouacapoua demonstrated the greatest plasticity in Amax/area, particularly in small saplings. 3. A distinction could be made between the effect of tree height and light availability on the structural, i.e. LMA, and photosynthetic leaf characteristics of all four species. The direction and magnitude of the variation in variables were similar among species. 4. LMA was the key variable that mainly determined variation in the other leaf variables along tree height and light availability gradients, with the exception of changes in chlorophyll concentration.Amax/area, N/area, LMA and stomatal conductance to water vapour (gs) increased, whereas Chl/mass decreased, with both increasing tree height and canopy openness.Amax/mass, PNUE max and Amax/Chl increased with increasing openness only. N/mass and Chl/area were independent of tree height and openness, except for small saplings of Goupia which had a much lower Chl/area.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Comparative photosynthesis of sun and shade plants
Boardman, N. K. (1977) · Annual Review of Plant Physiology · doi:10.1146/annurev.pp.28.060177.002035 · Cited by 1,826
Cited by
Niinemets, Ü. (2010) · Ecological Research · doi:10.1007/s11284-010-0712-4 · Cited by 676
Freschet, G. T., Swart, E. M., & Cornelissen, J. H. C. (2015) · New Phytologist · doi:10.1111/nph.13352 · Cited by 384
Feng, L., Raza, M. A., Li, Z., Chen, Y., Khalid, M. H. B., Du, J., Liu, W., Wu, X., Song, C., Yu, L., et al. (2019) · Frontiers in Plant Science · doi:10.3389/fpls.2018.01952 · Cited by 283
Jaikumar, N. S., Snapp, S. S., & Sharkey, T. D. (2013) · American Journal of Botany · doi:10.3732/ajb.1300122 · Cited by 29
Metadata
- Authors
- Rijkers, T., Pons, T. L., & Bongers, F.
- Venue
- Functional Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 14
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 77-86
- ISSN
- 0269-8463 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2435
- OpenAlex
- W2075992556
- Cited by
- 217
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 5.66
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effect of tree height and light availability on photosynthetic leaf traits of four neotropical species differing in shade tolerance. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00395.x
- The paper
- Rijkers, T., Pons, T. L., & Bongers, F. (2000). The effect of tree height and light availability on photosynthetic leaf traits of four neotropical species differing in shade tolerance. Functional Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2435.2000.00395.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.