Cited by 61Developmental Biology and Gene RegulationWnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancerNeurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms

Involvement of NLK and Sox11 in neural induction in Xenopus development

Open access
Hyodo‐Miura, Junko, Urushiyama, Seiichi, Nagai, Shin‐ichi, Nishita, Michiru, Ueno, Naoto, Shibuya, Hiroshi·2002·Genes to Cells

Abstract

Background The Wnt signal transduction pathway regulates various aspects of embryonal development and has been implicated in promoting cancer. Signalling by Wnts leads to the stabilization of cytosolic beta-catenin, which then associates with TCF transcription factors to regulate expression of Wnt-target genes. The Wnt pathway is further subject to cross-regulation at various levels by other components. Results Recent evidence suggests that a specific MAP kinase pathway involving the MAP kinase kinase kinase TAK1 and the MAP kinase NLK counteract Wnt signalling. In particular, it has been shown that TAK1 activates NLK, which phosphorylates TCFs bound to beta-catenin. This phosphorylation down-regulates the DNA-binding activity of a TCF-4/beta-catenin complex, and blocks activation of their target genes. To investigate the role of NLK in Xenopus development, we isolated xNLK, a Xenopus homologue of NLK. Our findings indicate that xNLK is expressed in neural tissues and induces the anterior-neural marker gene, Otx-2. Moreover, xSox11, which is induced by the expression of Chordin, co-operates with xNLK to induce neural development. These molecules also interact in mammalian cells, and expression of a mutant of xNLK lacking kinase activity was found to suppress the induction of neural marker gene expression by xSox11. Conclusions Our findings indicate that xNLK may play a role in neural development together with xSox11 during early Xenopus embryogenesis.

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2443.2002.00536.x

Cites

3 of 3 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

We couldn’t retrieve this paper’s full text, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Authors
Hyodo‐Miura, J., Urushiyama, S., Nagai, S., Nishita, M., Ueno, N., & Shibuya, H.
Affiliations
  • National Institute for Basic Biology (JP)
  • Tokyo Medical and Dental University (JP)
Venue
Genes to Cells
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2002-05
Volume
7
Issue
5
Pages
487-496
ISSN
  • 1356-9597 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2443
OpenAlex
W1966830858
Cited by
61
References
3
Citations by year
2025: 2 · 2024: 2 · 2022: 3 · 2021: 1 · 2020: 2 · 2018: 1 · 2017: 2 · 2016: 5 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 2 · 2013: 2 · 2012: 3
FWCI
1.27
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
Locations
  • Genes to Cells (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Funders
  • Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare
  • Japan Society for the Promotion of Science
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Developmental Biology and Gene Regulation
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Molecular Biology › Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Developmental Neuroscience › Neurogenesis and neuroplasticity mechanisms
Keywords
Nemo-like kinase, SOX11, neural induction, Wnt signaling, TAK1, MAPK signaling, β-catenin, chordin, Xenopus embryogenesis, kinase activity
MeSH terms
Animals, Cell Differentiation, Cloning, Molecular, Embryonic Induction, High Mobility Group Proteins, Nervous System, Neurons, Oocytes, Protein Binding, RNA, Messenger, Xenopus, Mitogen-Activated Protein Kinases, Xenopus Proteins, SOXC Transcription Factors

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review