Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 601

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Sea-level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity fornorthern Europe

Open access
Lambeck, Kurt, Smither, Catherine, Johnston, Paul·1998·Geophysical Journal International

Abstract

Northwestern Europe remains a key region for testing models of glacial isostasy because of the good geological record of crustal response to the glacial unloading since the time of the Last Glacial Maximum. Models for this rebound and associated sea-level change require a detailed knowledge of the ice-sheet geometry, including the ice thickness through time. Existing ice-sheet reconstructions are strongly model-dependent, and inversions of sea-level data for the mantle response may be a function of the model assumptions. Thus inverse solutions for the sea-level data are sought that include both ice- and earth-model parameters as unknowns. Sea-level data from Fennoscandia, the North Sea, the British Isles and the Atlantic and English Channel coasts have been evaluated and incorporated into the solutions. The starting ice sheet for Fennoscandia is based on a reconstruction of a model by Denton & Hughes (1981) that is characterized by quasi-parabolic cross-sections and symmetry about the load centre. Both global (northwestern Europe as a whole) and regional (subsets of the data) solutions have been made for earth-model parameters and ice-height scaling parameters. The key results are as follows. (1) The response of the upper mantle to the changing ice and water loads is spatially relatively homogenous across Scandinavia, the North Sea and the British Isles. (2) This response can be adequately modelled by an effective elastic lithosphere of thickness 65–85 km and by an effective upper-mantle viscosity (from the base of the lithosphere to the 670 km depth seismic discontinuity) of about 3–4×1020 Pa s. The effective lower-mantle viscosity is at least an order of magnitude greater. (3) The ice thickness over Scandinavia at the time of maximum glaciation was only about 2000 m, much less than the 3400 m assumed in the Denton & Hughes model. (4) The ice profiles are asymmetric about the centre of the ice sheet with those over the western part being consistent with quasi-parabolic functions whereas the ice heights over the eastern and southern regions increase much more slowly with distance inwards from the ice margin.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00541.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 601

Metadata

Authors
Lambeck, K., Smither, C., & Johnston, P.
Venue
Geophysical Journal International
Published
1998-07
Volume
134
Issue
1
Pages
102-144
ISSN
  • 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-246X
OpenAlex
W1964286915
Cited by
601
References
0
FWCI
20.94
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Sea-level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity fornorthern Europe. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00541.x
The paper
Lambeck, K., Smither, C., & Johnston, P. (1998). Sea-level change, glacial rebound and mantle viscosity fornorthern Europe. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.1998.00541.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.