The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Upper mantle stratification by P and S receiver functions
Open accessAbstract
Summary Seismic stratification of the upper mantle is investigated by applying two complementary techniques to the records of the Graefenberg array in southern Germany. The anisotropic P receiver function technique (Kosarev et al. 1984; Vinnik & Montagner 1996) is modified by using summary seismic events instead of individual events and different weighting functions instead of the same function for the harmonic angular analysis of the SV and T components of the Pds phases. The summary events provide better separation of the second azimuthal harmonic than the individual events. The parameters of the second harmonics of SV and T thus evaluated should be similar if they reflect the effects of azimuthal anisotropy. This can be used as a criterion to identify the anisotropy. To detect the Sdp phases and their azimuthal variations caused by azimuthal anisotropy we have developed a stacking technique, which can be termed the S receiver function technique It includes axis rotation to separate interfering P and S arrivals, determination of the principal (M) component of the S-wave motion, deconvolution of the P components of many recordings by their respective M components and stacking of the deconvolved P components with weights depending on the level of noise and the angle between the M direction and the backazimuth of the event. Both techniques yield consistent results for the Graefenberg array. As indicated by the P receiver functions, the upper layer of the mantle between the Moho and 80 km depth is anisotropic with dVs/Vs around 0.03 and the fast direction close to 20° clockwise from north. The fast direction of anisotropy below this layer is around 110°, The boundary between the upper and the lower anisotropic layers is manifested by the detectable Pds and Sdp converted phases. Shear wave splitting in SKS is strongly dominated by azimuthal anisotropy in the lower layer (asthenosphere).
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Seismic Evidence for Sharp Lithosphere-Asthenosphere Boundaries of Oceanic Plates
Kawakatsu, H., Kumar, P., Takei, Y., Shinohara, M., Kanazawa, T., Araki, E., & Suyehiro, K. (2009) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1169499 · Cited by 591
The elusive lithosphere–asthenosphere boundary (LAB) beneath cratons
Eaton, D. W., Darbyshire, F., Evans, R. L., Grütter, H., Jones, A. G., & Yuan, X. (2009) · Lithos · doi:10.1016/j.lithos.2008.05.009 · Cited by 438
North American lithospheric discontinuity structure imaged by Ps and Sp receiver functions
Abt, D. L., Fischer, K. M., French, S. W., Ford, H. A., Yuan, H., & Romanowicz, B. (2010) · Journal of Geophysical Research: Solid Earth · doi:10.1029/2009jb006914 · Cited by 318
Rejuvenation of the lithosphere by the Hawaiian plume
Li, X., Kind, R., Yuan, X., Wölbern, I., & Hanka, W. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02349 · Cited by 254
Thickness of the central and eastern European lithosphere as seen by S receiver functions
Geissler, W. H., Sodoudi, F., & Kind, R. (2010) · Geophysical Journal International · doi:10.1111/j.1365-246x.2010.04548.x · Cited by 114
Metadata
- Authors
- Farra, V., & Vinnik, L.
- Venue
- Geophysical Journal International
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2000-06-01
- Volume
- 141
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 699-712
- ISSN
- 0956-540X (ISSN-L)
- 1365-246X
- OpenAlex
- W2111691224
- Cited by
- 325
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 9.07
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Upper mantle stratification by P and S receiver functions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00118.x
- The paper
- Farra, V., & Vinnik, L. (2000). Upper mantle stratification by P and S receiver functions. Geophysical Journal International. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00118.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.