The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Evidence from rain‐use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification
Open accessAbstract
Desertification is regarded as one of the major global environmental problems of the 20th century and the African Sahel is often quoted as the most seriously affected region. Previous attempts to map the occurrence and severity of desertification in the Sahel have been unsatisfactory, mainly because of the lack of any readily measured, objective indicators. We explore here the properties of the ratio of net primary production (NPP) to precipitation – the rain‐use efficiency (RUE) – calculated from remotely sensed vegetation indices and rain gauge data. Negative deviations from the normal range of RUE values are shown to be an indicator of desertification. Observations of NPP of the entire Sahel were possible using satellite platforms for the period 1982–90, including the 1984 drought. The results suggest that NPP was remarkably resilient, a fact that was reflected in only little variation in the RUE during the period of study. Thus, in much of the region, NPP seems to be in step with rainfall, recovering rapidly following drought and not supporting the fears of widespread, subcontinental scale desertification taking place in the 9‐year period that is studied. In fact the results show a small but systematic increase in RUE for the Sahel as a whole from 1982 to 1990, although some areas contained within the region did have persistently low values.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
(2002) · Medical Entomology and Zoology · Cited by 1,279
Atmospheric global dust cycle and iron inputs to the ocean
Mahowald, N. M., Baker, A. R., Bergametti, G., Brooks, N., Duce, R. A., Jickells, T. D., Kubilay, N., Prospero, J. M., & Tegen, I. (2005) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/2004gb002402 · Cited by 1,236
Remote sensing of drought: Progress, challenges and opportunities
AghaKouchak, A., Farahmand, A., Melton, F. S., Teixeira, J., Anderson, M. C., Wardlow, B. D., & Hain, C. R. (2015) · Reviews of Geophysics · doi:10.1002/2014rg000456 · Cited by 989
Nicholson, S. E. (2013) · ISRN Meteorology · doi:10.1155/2013/453521 · Cited by 742
A review of environmental droughts: Increased risk under global warming?
Vicente-Serrano, S. M., Quiring, S. M., Peña-Gallardo, M., Yuan, S., & Domínguez-Castro, F. (2020) · Earth-Science Reviews · doi:10.1016/j.earscirev.2019.102953 · Cited by 733
Metadata
- Authors
- Prince, S. D., De Colstoun, E. B., & Kravitz, L. L.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-04
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 359-374
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2088115382
- Cited by
- 370
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.01
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Evidence from rain‐use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00158.x
- The paper
- Prince, S. D., De Colstoun, E. B., & Kravitz, L. L. (1998). Evidence from rain‐use efficiencies does not indicate extensive Sahelian desertification. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00158.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.