The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Microbial community structure and global trace gases
Abstract
Global change can affect soil processes by either altering the functioning of existing organisms or by restructuring the community, modifying the fundamental physiologies that drive biogeochemical processes. Thus, not only might process rates change, but the controls over them might also change. Moreover, previously insignificant processes could become important. These possibilities raise the question ‘Will changes in climate and land use restructure microbial communities in a way that will alter trace gas fluxes from an ecosystem?’ Process studies indicate that microbial community structure can influence trace gas dynamics at a large scale. For example, soil respiration and CH 4 production both show ranges of temperature response among ecosystems, indicating differences in the microbial communities responsible. There are three patterns of NH 4+ inhibition of CH 4 oxidation at the ecosystem scale: no inhibition, immediate inhibition, and delayed inhibition; these are associated with different CH 4 oxidizer communities. Thus, it is possible that changes in climate, land‐use, and disturbance regimes could alter microbial communities in ways that would substantially alter trace gas fluxes; we discuss the data supporting this conclusion. We also discuss approaches to developing research linking microbial community structure and activity to the structure and functioning of the whole ecosystem. Modern techniques allow us to identify active organisms even if they have not been cultivated; in combination with traditional experimental approaches we should be able to identify the linkages between these active populations and the processes they carry out at the ecosystem level. Finally, we describe scenarios of how global change could alter trace gas fluxes by altering microbial communities and how understanding the microbial community dynamics could improve our ability to predict future trace gas fluxes.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Effects of plant species on nutrient cycling
Hobbie, S. E. (1992) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(92)90126-v · Cited by 1,242
Cited by
The contribution of species richness and composition to bacterial services
Bell, T., Newman, J. A., Silverman, B. W., Turner, S. L., & Lilley, A. K. (2005) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature03891 · Cited by 950
Influence of Drying-Rewetting Frequency on Soil Bacterial Community Structure
Fierer, N., Schimel, J. P., & Holden, P. A. (2003) · Microbial Ecology · doi:10.1007/s00248-002-1007-2 · Cited by 720
Self-citationSaggar, S., Jha, N., Deslippe, J., Bolan, N. S., Luo, J., Giltrap, D. L., Kim, D.-G., Zaman, M., & Tillman, R. W. (2013) · Science of The Total Environment · doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2012.11.050 · Cited by 543
Kuzyakov, Y., & Bol, R. (2006) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2005.06.025 · Cited by 324
Waldrop, M. P., & Firestone, M. K. (2004) · Oecologia · doi:10.1007/s00442-003-1419-9 · Cited by 310
Metadata
- Authors
- SCHIMEL, J. P., & GULLEDGE, J.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1998-10
- Volume
- 4
- Issue
- 7
- Pages
- 745-758
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2093673598
- Cited by
- 289
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.42
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial community structure and global trace gases. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00195.x
- The paper
- SCHIMEL, J. P., & GULLEDGE, J. (1998). Microbial community structure and global trace gases. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1998.00195.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.