Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 366

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

A free‐air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2

Hendrey, George R., Ellsworth, David S., Lewin, Keith F., Nagy, JohN.·1999·Global Change Biology

Abstract

A free‐air CO 2 enrichment (FACE) system was designed to permit the experimental exposure of tall vegetation such as stands of forest trees to elevated atmospheric CO 2 concentrations ([CO 2]a) without enclosures that alter tree microenvironment. We describe a prototype FACE system currently in operation in forest plots in a maturing loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) stand in North Carolina, USA. The system uses feedback control technology to control [CO 2] in a 26 m diameter forest plot that is over 10 m tall, while monitoring the 3D plot volume to characterize the whole‐stand CO 2 regime achieved during enrichment. In the second summer season of operation of the FACE system, atmospheric CO 2 enrichment was conducted in the forest during all daylight hours for 96.7% of the scheduled running time from 23 May to 14 October with a preset target [CO 2] of 550 μmol mol–1, ≈ 200 μmol mol–1 above ambient [CO 2]. The system provided spatial and temporal control of [CO 2] similar to that reported for open‐top chambers over trees, but without enclosing the vegetation. The daily average daytime [CO 2] within the upper forest canopy at the centre of the FACE plot was 552 ± 9 μmol mol–1 (mean ± SD). The FACE system maintained 1‐minute average [CO 2] to within ± 110 μmol mol–1 of the target [CO 2] for 92% of the operating time. Deviations of [CO 2] outside of this range were short‐lived (most lasting < 60 s) and rare, with fewer than 4 excursion events of a minute or longer per day. Acceptable spatial control of [CO 2] by the system was achieved, with over 90% of the entire canopy volume within ± 10% of the target [CO 2] over the exposure season. CO 2 consumption by the FACE system was much higher than for open‐top chambers on an absolute basis, but similar to that of open‐top chambers and branch bag chambers on a per unit volume basis. CO 2 consumption by the FACE system was strongly related to windspeed, averaging 50 g CO 2 m–3 h–1 for the stand for an average windspeed of 1.5 m s–1 during summer. The [CO 2] control results show that the free‐air approach is a tractable way to study long‐term and short‐term alterations in trace gases, even within entire tall forest ecosystems. The FACE approach permits the study of a wide range of forest stand and ecosystem processes under manipulated [CO 2]a that were previously impossible or intractable to study in true forest ecosystems.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00228.x

Cites

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 366

Metadata

Authors
Hendrey, G. R., Ellsworth, D. S., Lewin, K. F., & Nagy, J.
Venue
Global Change Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1999-03
Volume
5
Issue
3
Pages
293-309
ISSN
  • 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2486
OpenAlex
W2093866968
Cited by
366
References
0
FWCI
24.40
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: A free‐air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00228.x
The paper
Hendrey, G. R., Ellsworth, D. S., Lewin, K. F., & Nagy, J. (1999). A free‐air enrichment system for exposing tall forest vegetation to elevated atmospheric CO2. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.1999.00228.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.