The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high‐latitude soils
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Despite the importance of Arctic and boreal regions in the present carbon cycle, estimates of annual high‐latitude carbon fluxes vary in sign and magnitude. Without accurate estimates of current carbon fluxes from Arctic and boreal ecosystems, predicting the response of these systems to global change is daunting. A number of factors control carbon turnover in high‐latitude soils, but because they are unique to northern systems, they are mostly ignored by biogeochemical models used to predict the response of these systems to global change. Here, we review those factors. First, many northern systems are dominated by mosses, whose extremely slow decomposition is not predicted by commonly used indices of litter quality. Second, cold temperature, permafrost, waterlogging, and substrate quality interact to stabilize soil organic matter, but the relative importance of these factors, and how they respond to climate change, is unknown. Third, recent evidence suggests that biological activity occurring over winter can contribute significantly to annual soil carbon fluxes. However, the controls over this winter activity remain poorly understood. Finally, processes at the landscape scale, such as fire, permafrost dynamics, and drainage, control regional carbon fluxes, complicating the extrapolation of site‐level measurements to regional scales.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Climatic, edaphic, and biotic controls over storage and turnover of carbon in soils
Schimel, D. S., Braswell, B. H., Holland, E. A., McKeown, R., Ojima, D. S., Painter, T. H., Parton, W. J., & Townsend, A. R. (1994) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1029/94gb00993 · Cited by 1,060
Cited by
Vulnerability of Permafrost Carbon to Climate Change: Implications for the Global Carbon Cycle
Schuur, E. A. G., Bockheim, J., Canadell, J. G., Euskirchen, E., Field, C. B., Goryachkin, S. V., Hagemann, S., Kuhry, P., Lafleur, P. M., Lee, H., et al. (2008) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/b580807 · Cited by 1,642
How strongly can forest management influence soil carbon sequestration?
Jandl, R., Lindner, M., Vesterdal, L., Bauwens, B., Baritz, R., Hagedorn, F., Johnson, D. W., Minkkinen, K., & Byrne, K. A. (2007) · Geoderma · doi:10.1016/j.geoderma.2006.09.003 · Cited by 1,458
Ecosystem carbon storage in arctic tundra reduced by long-term nutrient fertilization
Mack, M. C., Schuur, E. A. G., Bret-Harte, M. S., Shaver, G. R., & Chapin, F. S. (2004) · Nature · doi:10.1038/nature02887 · Cited by 1,030
Carbon Storage and Fluxes within Freshwater Wetlands: a Critical Review
Kayranli, B., Scholz, M., Mustafa, A., & Hedmark, Å. (2010) · Wetlands · doi:10.1007/s13157-009-0003-4 · Cited by 690
Toward more realistic projections of soil carbon dynamics by Earth system models
Luo, Y., Ahlström, A., Allison, S. D., Batjes, N. H., Brovkin, V., Carvalhais, N., Chappell, A., Ciais, P., Davidson, E. A., Finzi, A., et al. (2016) · Global Biogeochemical Cycles · doi:10.1002/2015gb005239 · Cited by 533
Self-citation
Metadata
- Authors
- Hobbie, S. E., Schimel, J. P., Trumbore, S. E., & Randerson, J. R.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-12
- Volume
- 6
- Issue
- S1
- Pages
- 196-210
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2139432134
- Cited by
- 636
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 29.83
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high‐latitude soils. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06021.x
- The paper
- Hobbie, S. E., Schimel, J. P., Trumbore, S. E., & Randerson, J. R. (2000). Controls over carbon storage and turnover in high‐latitude soils. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.06021.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.