The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest
Abstract
Nutrient supply commonly limits aboveground plant productivity in forests, but the effects of an altered nutrient supply on gross primary production (GPP) and patterns of carbon (C) allocation remain poorly characterized. Increased nutrient supply may lead to a higher aboveground net primary production (ANPP), but a lower total belowground carbon allocation (TBCA), with little change in either aboveground plant respiration (APR) or GPP. Alternatively, increases in nutrient supply may increase GPP, with the quantity of GPP allocated aboveground increasing more steeply than the quantity of GPP allocated belowground. To examine the effects of an elevated nutrient supply on the C allocation patterns in forests, we determined whole‐ecosystem C budgets in unfertilized plots of Eucalyptus saligna and in adjacent plots receiving regular additions of 65 kg N ha−1, 31 kg P ha−1, 46 kg K ha−1, and macro‐ and micronutrients. We measured the absolute flux of C allocated to the components of GPP (ANPP, TBCA and APR), as well as the fraction of GPP allocated to these components. Fertilization dramatically increased GPP. Averaged over 3 years, GPP in the fertilized plots was 34% higher than that in the unfertilized controls (3.95 vs. 2.95 kg C m−2 yr−1). Fertilization‐related increases in GPP were allocated entirely aboveground – ANPP was 85% higher and APR was 57% higher in the fertilized than in the control plots, while TBCA did not differ significantly between treatments. Carbon use efficiency (NPP/GPP) was slightly higher in the fertilized (0.53) compared with the control plots (0.51). Overall, fertilization increased ANPP and APR, and these increases were related to a greater GPP and an increase in the fraction of GPP allocated aboveground.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Soil carbon sequestration and land‐use change: processes and potential
Post, W. M., & Kwon, K. C. (2000) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2486.2000.00308.x · Cited by 2,602
Cited by
CO 2 balance of boreal, temperate, and tropical forests derived from a global database
LUYSSAERT, S., INGLIMA, I., JUNG, M., RICHARDSON, A. D., REICHSTEIN, M., PAPALE, D., PIAO, S. L., SCHULZE, E. ‐., WINGATE, L., MATTEUCCI, G., et al. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01439.x · Cited by 1,010
Interpreting, measuring, and modeling soil respiration
Ryan, M. G., & Law, B. E. (2005) · Biogeochemistry · doi:10.1007/s10533-004-5167-7 · Cited by 722
Self-citationMixed-species plantations of Eucalyptus with nitrogen-fixing trees: A review
Forrester, D. I., Bauhus, J., Cowie, A. L., & Vanclay, J. K. (2006) · Forest Ecology and Management · doi:10.1016/j.foreco.2006.05.012 · Cited by 536
Forest carbon use efficiency: is respiration a constant fraction of gross primary production?
DeLUCIA, E. H., DRAKE, J. E., THOMAS, R. B., & GONZALEZ‐MELER, M. (2007) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2007.01365.x · Cited by 493
Multiple nutrients limit litterfall and decomposition in a tropical forest
Kaspari, M., Garcia, M. N., Harms, K. E., Santana, M., Wright, S. J., & Yavitt, J. B. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01124.x · Cited by 489
Metadata
- Authors
- Giardina, C. P., Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., & Fownes, J. H.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-10
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 10
- Pages
- 1438-1450
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2135867960
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 15.52
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00558.x
- The paper
- Giardina, C. P., Ryan, M. G., Binkley, D., & Fownes, J. H. (2003). Primary production and carbon allocation in relation to nutrient supply in a tropical experimental forest. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00558.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.