The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest
Abstract
We analyzed one year of continuous soil respiration measurements to assess variations in the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration at a Danish beech forest. A single temperature function derived from all measurements across the year (Q10 = 4.2) was adequate for estimating the total annual soil respiration and its seasonal evolution. However, Q10's derived from weekly datasets ranged between three in summer (at a mean soil temperature of 14 °C) and 23 in winter (at 2 °C), indicating that the annual temperature function underestimated the synoptic variations in soil respiration during winter. These results highlight that empirical models should be parameterized at a time resolution similar to that required by the output of the model. If the objective of the model is to simulate the total annual soil respiration rate, annual parameterization suffices. If however, soil respiration needs to be simulated over time periods from days to weeks, as is the case when soil respiration is compared to total ecosystem respiration during synoptic weather patterns, more short‐term parameterization is required. Despite the higher wintertime Q10's, the absolute response of soil respiration to temperature was smaller in winter than in summer. This is mainly because in absolute numbers, the temperature sensitivity of soil respiration depends not only on Q10, but also on the rate of soil respiration, which is highly reduced in winter. Nonetheless, the Q10 of soil respiration in winter was larger than can be explained by the decreasing respiration rate only. Because the seasonal changes in Q10 were negatively correlated with temperature and positively correlated with soil moisture, they could also be related to changing temperature and/or soil moisture conditions.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
On the variability of respiration in terrestrial ecosystems: moving beyond Q10
DAVIDSON, E. A., JANSSENS, I. A., & LUO, Y. (2006) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2005.01065.x · Cited by 1,311
Self-citationBaldocchi, D. (2008) · Australian Journal of Botany · doi:10.1071/bt07151 · Cited by 1,123
The temperature dependence of organic-matter decomposition—still a topic of debate
KIRSCHBAUM, M. (2006) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2006.01.030 · Cited by 587
Kirschbaum, M. U. F. (2004) · Global Change Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2486.2004.00852.x · Cited by 377
Almagro, M., López, J., Querejeta, J. I., & Martínez-Mena, M. (2009) · Soil Biology and Biochemistry · doi:10.1016/j.soilbio.2008.12.021 · Cited by 332
Metadata
- Authors
- JANSSENS, I. A., & PILEGAARD, K.
- Venue
- Global Change Biology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-05-29
- Volume
- 9
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 911-918
- ISSN
- 1354-1013 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2486
- OpenAlex
- W2041570407
- Cited by
- 399
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00636.x
- The paper
- JANSSENS, I. A., & PILEGAARD, K. (2003). Large seasonal changes in Q10 of soil respiration in a beech forest. Global Change Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2486.2003.00636.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.