CoChat
Sign Up
Cited by 105Pharmaceutical Economics and PolicyPharmacy and Medical PracticesHealthcare Systems and Reforms

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 29 of the 32 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Access to medicines: cost as an influence on the views and behaviour of patients

Schafheutle, Ellen I., Hassell, Karen, Noyce, Peter R.·2002·Health & Social Care in the Community
DOI 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00356.x
Open this paper in CoChat — free account

Abstract

The present paper explores how charges for medicines incurred by patients influence their decisions for managing acute or chronic conditions, and whether prescription cost and affordability issues are discussed in the general practitioner (GP)-patient encounter. People suffering from dyspepsia, hay fever or hypertension, or those taking hormone replacement therapy, were recruited through three community pharmacies in the North-west of England. Six focus groups were conducted with a total of 31 participants, the majority of whom were non-exempt from prescription charges. The management behaviour of those participants who had to pay for their prescriptions, particularly those from less-affluent or deprived backgrounds, was influenced by cost. However, cost was not the overriding influence, with other factors, such as symptom or disease severity, effectiveness, or necessity of treatment, playing a more important part in participants' management decisions. Cost as an issue was reflected in the various strategies used by participants to reduce medication cost, such as not having some prescribed items dispensed, taking a smaller dose or buying a cheaper over-the-counter product. Despite the use of numerous strategies, participants did not talk to their GPs about issues of cost and affordability. Participants felt that paying for prescriptions was their problem. There was a belief that discussing cost issues could jeopardise the doctor-patient relationship. Although not the dominant factor, medication cost nevertheless influenced participants when deciding how to manage their condition. Awareness of the existence of prepayment certificates, which can be bought by patients who require regular medication, was low, and this should be addressed through improved information/dissemination. Despite the high level of prescription items exempt, the current level of the prescription charge is still a barrier to obtaining prescription medicines under the National Health Service to those on lower incomes.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00356.x

Cites

29 of 29 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

Research works printed but not linked: 8

  1. Anonymous, 2000, Antihypertensive compliance and stroke risk, Pharmaceutical Journal, 10, 642
  2. British Medical Association General Practitioners’ Committee, 2001, The Future of Prescribing. Discussion Paper
  3. Department of Health, 1999, Statistics of Prescriptions Dispensed in the Community: England 1988 to 1998
  4. Department of Health, 2000, Pharmacy in the Future - Implementing the NHS Plan
  5. Hassell, 1996, The use of focus groups in pharmacy research: processes and practicalities, Journal of Social and Administrative Pharmacy, 13, 169
  6. Nathan, 1996, A non-prescription medicines formulary. 4. Hay fever treatments, Pharmaceutical Journal, 256, 188
  7. Phelps, 2001, Unhealthy Charges. CAB Evidence on the Impact of Health Charges
  8. Royal Pharmaceutical Society of Great Britain, 1997, From Compliance to Concordance: Achieving Shared Goals in Medicine Taking.

Cited by

Sorted by citations

See all 105

Related

See all

Metadata

Authors
Schafheutle, E. I., Hassell, K., & Noyce, P. R.
Affiliations
University of Manchester (GB)
ORCID
Schafheutle, Ellen I.
Venue
Health & Social Care in the Community
Publisher
Hindawi Limited
Published
2002-04-30
Volume
10
Issue
3
Pages
187-195
ISSN
0966-0410 (ISSN-L)
DOI
10.1046/j.1365-2524.2002.00356.x
OpenAlex
W2076062096
Cited by
105
References
32
Citations by year
2026: 2 · 2025: 1 · 2023: 2 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 7 · 2019: 6 · 2018: 2 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 2 · 2015: 2 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 1
FWCI
13.73
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Licence
Locations
  • Health & Social Care in the Community (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Research Explorer (The University of Manchester) (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Social Sciences › Economics, Econometrics and Finance › Economics and Econometrics › Pharmaceutical Economics and Policy
  • Health Sciences › Health Professions › Pharmacy › Pharmacy and Medical Practices
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Healthcare Systems and Reforms
Keywords
prescription charges, drug affordability, patient decision-making, socioeconomic deprivation, physician-patient relationship, dyspepsia, allergic rhinitis, hypertension, hormone replacement therapy, National Health Service
MeSH terms
Adult, Aged, Aged, 80 and over, Communication, Decision Making, England, Fees, Pharmaceutical, Female, Health Services Accessibility, Humans, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Compliance, Physician-Patient Relations, Cost Sharing, Focus Groups, Drugs, Essential

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review