Cited by 89Animal Behavior and ReproductionNeurobiology and Insect Physiology ResearchEvolution and Genetic Dynamics

Inbreeding and outbreeding depression in male courtship song characters in Drosophila montana

Aspi, Jouni·2000·Heredity

Abstract

In Drosophila montana, male courtship song frequency is closely associated with male courtship success and offspring survival. Other pulse characters (pulse length and cycle number) may also affect female mate choice, whereas pulse train characters (interpulse interval, pulse number and pulse train length) are not associated with these male fitness components. Inbreeding depression in these song characters was investigated by comparing the songs of inbred and outbred fly strains. The average change in most song characters as a result of inbreeding was only a few percent. However, in male song frequency the average inbreeding depression was about 14%, suggesting that this song character is associated with fitness. Outbreeding depression and the genetic architecture of song characters were investigated with interpopulation crosses and joint scaling tests. For pulse train characters the generation means show only evidence of additivity, and the existence of dominance or epistasis in these characters was strongly rejected in each case. In pulse characters the means of the F1 males were lower than the average of the parental generations. In pulse length and cycle number this difference was attributable to dominance alone. In frequency there was outbreeding depression also in the F2 generation, suggesting a break-up of favourable epistatic gene combinations. The outbreeding depression in this character in the F1 generation was caused by dominance, and in the F2 also by duplicate ep…

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2540.2000.00655.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

  • Sexual signals were inbreeding-dependent in studies on fish and invertebrates.

    “It has, indeed, been shown that sexual signals were inbreeding-dependent in studies on fish and invertebrates [18–21].”

    From ‘Out of tune’: consequences of inbreeding on bird song (2016) · cites this paper as [18]

Cites

Flagged first, then by citations

Cited by

Sorted by citations

Authors
Aspi, J.
Affiliations
University of Oulu (FI)
Corresponding author
Aspi, Jouni
Venue
Heredity
Published
2000-03
Volume
84
Issue
3
Pages
273-282
ISSN
  • 0018-067X (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2540
OpenAlex
W2145798321
Cited by
89
References
1
Citations by year
2026: 1 · 2025: 3 · 2024: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 5 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 4 · 2015: 3 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 4 · 2012: 5
FWCI
4.17
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Heredity (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
Topics
  • Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Ecology, Evolution, Behavior and Systematics › Animal Behavior and Reproduction
  • Life Sciences › Neuroscience › Cellular and Molecular Neuroscience › Neurobiology and Insect Physiology Research
  • Life Sciences › Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology › Genetics › Evolution and Genetic Dynamics
Keywords
inbreeding depression, outbreeding depression, Drosophila montana, song frequency, pulse duration, number of cycles, dominance, epistasis, interpopulation crosses, genetic architecture, speciation, female mate choice
MeSH terms
Animals, Animal Communication, Crosses, Genetic, Drosophila, Epistasis, Genetic, Female, Inbreeding, Male, Models, Genetic, Phenotype, Sexual Behavior, Animal

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review