Dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria repens in Italy, an emergent zoonosis: report of 60 new cases
Open accessAbstract
Aims: Sixty new cases of human dirofilariasis due to Dirofilaria repens, occurring in Italy between 1990 and 1999, are presented. This is the most extensive case study of this zoonosis reported worldwide by a single study group. The aim is to utilize this large experience to characterize the different histopathological findings in the parasitic lesions in man. Methods and results: Diagnosis was performed on histological sections of the nematode enclosed in the nodules excised at biopsy or surgery. The nematode was located in the subcutaneous tissue (49 cases), the epididymis (two cases), the spermatic cord (two cases), the lung (two cases), the breast (two cases), the omentum (two cases) and under the conjunctival tissue (one case). The majority of cases (46) were from Piedmont; the remainder were from Emilia‐Romagna, Sardinia, Sicily, Tuscany, Apulia and Lombardy. The histopathological features of the lesions are described and the clinical and epidemiological aspects of the zoonosis are discussed. The prevalence in Italy in general and in the area of Piedmont in particular, comprising the provinces of Alessandria, Asti, Novara and Vercelli, which is one of the most severely affected areas of the world, is emphasized. The evident increase in the number of cases in the last few years is a clear indication that it is an emergent zoonosis. Conclusions: We recommend that each and every case observed be recorded, to enable the true extent of human dirofilariasis in Italy to be assessed, and that a reference centre be set up in the area to collate the data. The importance of the histopathologist's role in the diagnosis is stressed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The text we found for this paper looks like another document, so the self-check wasn’t run.
The citation lists haven’t been fetched yet
References 17 · Cited by 202
- Authors
- Pampiglione, S., Rivasi, F., Angeli, G., Boldorini, R., Incensati, R. M., Pastormerlo, M., Pavesi, M., & Ramponi, A.
- Affiliations
- University of Bologna (IT)
- University of Modena and Reggio Emilia (IT)
- Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Maggiore della Carita (IT)
- Corresponding author
- Rivasi, F
- Venue
- Histopathology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 344-354
- ISSN
- 0309-0167 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2559
- OpenAlex
- W2111294797
- Cited by
- 202
- References
- 17
- Citations by year
- 2026: 2 · 2025: 16 · 2024: 5 · 2023: 6 · 2022: 11 · 2021: 8 · 2020: 9 · 2019: 7 · 2018: 6 · 2017: 7 · 2016: 6 · 2015: 14 · 2014: 14 · 2013: 7 · 2012: 10
- FWCI
- 4.35
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- green
- hdl.handle.net
- Locations
- Histopathology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- IRIS UNIMORE (University of Modena and Reggio Emilia) (submittedVersion, cc-by)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Infectious Diseases › Parasitic Diseases Research and Treatment
- Health Sciences › Veterinary › Small Animals › Helminth infection and control
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health › Research on Leishmaniasis Studies
- Keywords
- Dirofilaria repens, human dirofilariasis, zoonoses, emerging zoonoses, subcutaneous nodules, prevalence, Piedmont, Italy, case series
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Aged, Animals, Biopsy, Child, Preschool, Dirofilariasis, Female, Histological Techniques, Humans, Italy, Male, Middle Aged, Zoonoses
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review