Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 776

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty‐three arthropod species

Jeyaprakash, A., Hoy, M. A.·2000·Insect Molecular Biology

Abstract

Bacteria belonging to the genus Wolbachia are associated with a variety of reproductive anomalies in arthropods. Allele‐specific polymerase chain reaction (= Standard PCR) routinely has been used to amplify Wolbachia DNA from arthropods. While testing the two‐spotted spider mite Tetranychus urticae and other arthropods known to be infected with Wolbachia , Standard PCR frequently produced false negatives, perhaps because the DNA from the arthropod host interfered with amplification by Taq DNA polymerase. Long PCR, which uses two enzymes ( Taq and Pwo ), consistently amplified Wolbachia DNA and a sensitivity analysis indicated that Long PCR was approximately six orders of magnitude more sensitive than Standard PCR in amplifying plasmid DNA spiked into insect genomic DNA. A survey indicated that 76% of sixty‐two arthropod species and two subspecies in thirteen orders tested positive for the Wolbachia wsp sequence by Long PCR, which is considerably higher than the rate of 16.9% obtained previously for the ftsZ sequence using Standard PCR ( Proc R Soc Lond B 262: 197–204). A subsample of Long PCR products from fourteen arthropod species and two subspecies were sequenced, both directly and after cloning. Two A‐ and eleven B‐ Wolbachia strains were detected and their wsp sequences displayed a maximum of 23.7% sequence divergence at this locus. Two new groups (named Fus and Ten) were identified in addition to nineteen reported earlier ( Proc R Soc Lond B 265: 1–7; Insect Mol Biol 8: 399–408), because they displayed more than 2.5% sequence divergence from other Wolbachia wsp sequences. PCR products from seventeen of twenty‐nine (59%) arthropod species analysed could not be sequenced directly due to apparent infection by multiple Wolbachia strains. The wsp sequences cloned from two such species ( Plutella xylostella and Trichoplusia ni ) indicated both A‐ and B‐ Wolbachia were present in a single individual. Hence, superinfection also may be more widespread than the 1.2% incidence previously estimated.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00203.x

Cites

1 of 1 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cited by

See all 776

Metadata

Authors
Jeyaprakash, A., & Hoy, M. A.
Venue
Insect Molecular Biology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-08
Volume
9
Issue
4
Pages
393-405
ISSN
  • 0962-1075 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2583
OpenAlex
W2002504652
Cited by
776
References
1
FWCI
70.20
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty‐three arthropod species. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00203.x
The paper
Jeyaprakash, A., & Hoy, M. A. (2000). Long PCR improves Wolbachia DNA amplification: wsp sequences found in 76% of sixty‐three arthropod species. Insect Molecular Biology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2583.2000.00203.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.