The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions
Abstract
AIM: The objective of the present study was to identify the microbial flora within root canals of teeth with failed root-canal treatment and to determine the association of the various species with clinical features. METHODOLOGY: Sixty root-filled teeth with persisting periapical lesions were selected for this study. During nonsurgical endodontic re-treatment, the root-filling material was removed and the canals were sampled. Microbial sampling, isolation and species determination were performed using advanced microbiological techniques for anaerobic species. The association of microbiological findings with clinical features was investigated. RESULTS: Microorganisms were recovered from 51 teeth. In most cases, one or two strains per canal were found. Of the microbial species isolated, 57.4% were facultative anaerobic species and 83.3% Gram-positive microorganisms. Enterococcus faecalis was the most frequently recovered bacterial species. Obligate anaerobes accounted for 42.6% of the species and the most frequently isolated genera was Peptostreptococcus. which was associated with clinical symptoms (P < 0.01). Significant associations were also observed between: (a) pain or history of pain and polymicrobial infections or anaerobes (P < 0.05): (b) tenderness to percussion and Prevotella intermedia/P. nigrescens (P < 0.05); (c) sinus and Streptococcus spp. (P < 0.001) or Actinomyces spp. (P < 0.01); (d) coronally unsealed teeth and Streptococcus spp. or Candida spp. (both with P < 0.01). CONCLUSION: The microbial flora in canals after failure of root-canal treatment were limited to a small number of predominantly Gram-positive microbial species. Facultative anaerobes, especially E. faecalis, were the most commonly isolated microorganisms, however, polymicrobial infections and obligate anaerobes were frequently found in canals of symptomatic root-filled teeth.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Parvekar, P., Palaskar, J., Metgud, S., Maria, R., & Dutta, S. (2020) · Biomaterial Investigations in Dentistry · doi:10.1080/26415275.2020.1796674 · Cited by 426
Photodynamic therapy in the control of oral biofilms
Soukos, N. S., & Goodson, J. M. (2011) · Periodontology 2000 · doi:10.1111/j.1600-0757.2010.00346.x · Cited by 342
Comparative Evaluation of Endodontic Irrigants against Enterococcus faecalis Biofilms
Dunavant, T. R., Regan, J. D., Glickman, G. N., Solomon, E. S., & Honeyman, A. L. (2006) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2005.09.001 · Cited by 301
Prabhakar, J., Senthilkumar, M., Priya, M. S., Mahalakshmi, K., Sehgal, P. K., & Sukumaran, V. G. (2010) · Journal of Endodontics · doi:10.1016/j.joen.2009.09.040 · Cited by 278
Antibacterial effects of MDPB against anaerobes associated with endodontic infections
Izutani, N., Imazato, S., Noiri, Y., & Ebisu, S. (2010) · International Endodontic Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2591.2010.01716.x · Cited by 20
Metadata
- Authors
- Pinheiro, E. T., Gomes, B. P. F. A., Ferraz, C. C. R., Sousa, E. L. R., Teixeira, F. B., & Souza-Filho, F. J.
- Venue
- International Endodontic Journal
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2003-01
- Volume
- 36
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 1-11
- ISSN
- 0143-2885 (ISSN-L)
- OpenAlex
- W2114070247
- Cited by
- 670
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 22.67
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00603.x
- The paper
- Pinheiro, E. T., Gomes, B. P. F. A., Ferraz, C. C. R., Sousa, E. L. R., Teixeira, F. B., & Souza-Filho, F. J. (2003). Microorganisms from canals of root-filled teeth with periapical lesions. International Endodontic Journal. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2591.2003.00603.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.