Reassessment of sperm morphology of archival semen smears from the period 1980–1994
Abstract
Several reports have suggested that sperm counts of normal men have declined in many geographical regions during the last decades. Deterioration of sperm morphology has also been reported in some studies covering long sample collecting periods. The original semen analysis data of our semen laboratory from the period 1980–1994 showed a significant decline in the proportion of spermatozoa with normal morphology. The finding was, however, questioned because of changes in sperm morphology assessment criteria during the study period. In the present study 1745 smears were re‐analysed to cover evenly the whole study period. The samples were examined in random order by using strict assessment criteria. Multiple linear regression analysis of the re‐analysed data showed no effect of the year of sample delivery on sperm morphology between the years 1980 and 1994. However, there was a significant decline in the proportion of normal spermatozoa with later year of men’s birth.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Classification drift exists between different classification systems (e.g., WHO 2nd, 3rd).
“Furthermore, studies have identified a classification drift between different classification systems (i.e., WHO 2nd, 3rd, etc.)56”
From Men with a complete absence of normal sperm morphology exhibit high rates of success without assisted reproduction (2017) · cites this paper as [6]
Cites
The evaluation of morphological characteristics of human spermatozoa according to stricter criteria
Menkveld, R., Stander, F. S. H., Kotze, T. J. V., Kruger, T. F., & Zyl, J. A. V. (1990) · Human Reproduction · doi:10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a137150 · Cited by 677 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Smith, R., Kovac, J., Cajipe, M., Lamb, D., & Lipshultz, L. (2017) · Asian Journal of Andrology · doi:10.4103/1008-682x.189211 · Cited by 66 · see citing works
Sperm morphology: classification drift over time and clinical implications
Morbeck, D. E., Leonard, P. H., Weaver, A. L., Shimek, K. M., Bouwsma, E. V. A., & Coddington, C. C. (2011) · Fertility and Sterility · doi:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2011.08.036 · Cited by 24 · see citing works
- Authors
- Horte, A., Vierula, M., Toppari, J., & Suominen, J.
- Affiliations
- University of Turku (FI)
- Corresponding author
- Suominen, J.
- Venue
- International Journal of Andrology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04-27
- Volume
- 24
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 120-124
- ISSN
- 0105-6263 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2605
- OpenAlex
- W1968832679
- Cited by
- 14
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2021: 2 · 2019: 1 · 2018: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 2
- FWCI
- 0.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- International Journal of Andrology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Funders
- European Commission
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Reproductive Medicine › Sperm and Testicular Function
- Health Sciences › Health Professions › General Health Professions › Male Reproductive Health Studies
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Rheumatology › Urologic and reproductive health conditions
- Keywords
- sperm morphology, sperm count decline, semen analysis, temporal trends, birth year, male fertility, semen quality
- MeSH terms
- Adult, Cross-Sectional Studies, Humans, Male, Spermatozoa, Time Factors
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review