The DOI matches its Crossref record; 4 of the 4 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Interpretive approaches in nursing research: the influence of Husserl and Heidegger
Abstract
This paper aims to throw some light on Husserlian phenomenology and Heideggerian hermeneutics, and to discuss their influences and applicability to the nursing research agenda There are definite distinctions between Husserhan transcendental phenomenology and Heideggerian hermeneutic phenomenology and these distinctions have implications for the methodology employed These traditions are discussed with respect to some fundamental research issues the philosophical perspectives of the traditions and the notion that data that result from the inquiry are created by the interaction between researcher and researched The central recommendation in this paper is that nurse researchers appraise the philosophical underpinnings of the methodologies they pursue
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Discovery of Grounded Theory; Strategies for Qualitative Research
Glaser, B. G., Strauss, A. L., & Strutzel, E. (1968) · Nursing Research · doi:10.1097/00006199-196807000-00014 · Cited by 39,449
The phenomenology of the social world
Bittner, E., Schutz, A., Walsh, G., & Lehnert, F. (1968) · American Sociological Review · doi:10.2307/2092457 · Cited by 3,588
The problem of rigor in qualitative research
Sandelowski, M. (1986) · Advances in Nursing Science · doi:10.1097/00012272-198604000-00005 · Cited by 2,772
Establishing rigour in qualitative research: the decision trail
Koch, T. (1994) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1994.tb01177.x · Cited by 1,127
Self-citation
Cited by
Laverty, S. M. (2003) · International Journal of Qualitative Methods · doi:10.1177/160940690300200303 · Cited by 2,095
Descriptive Versus Interpretive Phenomenology: Their Contributions to Nursing Knowledge
Lopez, K. A., & Willis, D. G. (2004) · Qualitative Health Research · doi:10.1177/1049732304263638 · Cited by 1,490
Hermeneutic research in nursing: developing a Gadamerian‐based research method
Fleming, V., Gaidys, U., & Robb, Y. (2003) · Nursing Inquiry · doi:10.1046/j.1440-1800.2003.00163.x · Cited by 601
Interviewing in phenomenology and grounded theory: is there a difference?
Wimpenny, P., & Gass, J. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01431.x · Cited by 472
Hermeneutic phenomenology: philosophical perspectives and current use in nursing research
Annells, M. (1996) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.1996.tb00041.x · Cited by 334
Metadata
- Authors
- Koch, T.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-05
- Volume
- 21
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 827-836
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2126301469
- Cited by
- 724
- References
- 4
- FWCI
- 13.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Interpretive approaches in nursing research: the influence of Husserl and Heidegger. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21050827.x
- The paper
- Koch, T. (1995). Interpretive approaches in nursing research: the influence of Husserl and Heidegger. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.21050827.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.