The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer
Abstract
Nurses can play a key role in patient education, including providing patients with useful and approrate information Rather than focusing on the process of education or information giving by nurses, this study places emphasis on the content of that information by taking the patients’perspective and asking the patients themselves what particular types of information are perceived as important at a specific point in time The aim of the study was to explore what particular types of information were important to women newly diagnosed with breast cancer, to enable nurses and other health care professionals to utilize their time as effectively as possible and provide a high‐quality service to individuals in their care Women with breast cancer (a mean of 2 5 weeks from diagnosis) were interviewed and asked to compare items of information The items of information were presented m pairs and the women stated a preference for one item in that pan‐ Thirty‐six pairs were presented in total The analysis involved the use of a Thurstone scaling model, which allowed rank ordermgs, or profiles of information needs, to be developed, reflecting the perceived importance of each item Information about the likelihood of cure, the spread of the disease and treatment options were perceived as the most important items of information at the tune of diagnosis Other information needs, in order of descending priority, included information about the risk to family, side‐effects
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Rutten, L. J. F., Arora, N. K., Bakos, A. D., Aziz, N., & Rowland, J. (2005) · Patient Education and Counseling · doi:10.1016/j.pec.2004.06.006 · Cited by 910
‘To me, it's my life’: medical communication, trust, and activism in cyberspace
Radin, P. (2006) · Social Science & Medicine · doi:10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.06.022 · Cited by 235
Assessing Information and Decision Preferences of Men With Prostate Cancer and Their Partners
Davison, B. J., Gleave, M. E., Goldenberg, S. L., Degner, L. F., Hoffart, D., & Berkowitz, J. (2002) · Cancer Nursing · doi:10.1097/00002820-200202000-00009 · Cited by 230
Self-citationMapping the quality of life and unmet needs of urban women with metastatic breast cancer
ARANDA, S., SCHOFIELD, P., WEIH, L., YATES, P., MILNE, D., FAULKNER, R., & VOUDOURIS, N. (2005) · European Journal of Cancer Care · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2354.2005.00541.x · Cited by 215
Xie, B., Wang, M., Feldman, R., & Zhou, L. (2013) · Journal of Medical Internet Research · doi:10.2196/jmir.2615 · Cited by 78
Metadata
- Authors
- Luker, K. A., Beaver, K., Leinster, S. J., Owens, R. G., Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-07
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 134-141
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2133681631
- Cited by
- 211
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 24.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010134.x
- The paper
- Luker, K. A., Beaver, K., Leinster, S. J., Owens, R. G., Degner, L. F., & Sloan, J. A. (1995). The information needs of women newly diagnosed with breast cancer. Journal of Advanced Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2648.1995.22010134.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.