Technology and the lifeworld of critical care nursing
Abstract
Traditionally, nursing scholars have concerned themselves with philosophies of science. This perspective reflects the Platonic dominance of theory over practice. The consequence of this view is that technology is conceived as an applied science. Furthermore, technology is considered as a neutral instrument of science. The primacy of theory was challenged by the philosopher Martin Heidegger, who argued that the correct relationship between these two concepts was a technology-science one. This reconceptualization suggests that practice precedes theory. This paper examines the developing body of literature concerning the philosophy of technology. Specifically, the philosophies of Martin Heidegger, Don Ihde, Albert Borgmann and Langdon Winner are explored from a nursing perspective, and how they may offer nursing a way of conceptualizing the ever expanding technological environment of the intensive care unit is discussed.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Expert nurses' focus of attention was the patient, while seamlessly integrating technology into everyday practice.
“Their focus of attention, while seamlessly integrating technology into everyday practice (Cooper 1993, Walters 1995), was the patient”
From The acquisition and exercise of nephrology nursing expertise: a grounded theory study (2006) · cites this paper as Walters 1995
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 20 · Cited by 61
- Authors
- Walters, A. J.
- Affiliations
- Royal Prince Alfred Hospital (AU)
- Corresponding author
- Walters, Allan John
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1995-08
- Volume
- 22
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 338-346
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2120063097
- Cited by
- 61
- References
- 20
- Citations by year
- 2025: 1 · 2024: 1 · 2023: 1 · 2019: 1 · 2017: 3 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 1 · 2014: 1 · 2013: 1 · 2012: 1
- FWCI
- 0.86
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
- Social Sciences › Psychology › Experimental and Cognitive Psychology › Phenomenology and Existential Philosophy
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing education and management
- Keywords
- philosophy of technology, critical care nursing, intensive care unit, Martin Heidegger, Don Ihde, Albert Borgmann, Langdon Winner, theory-practice integration, nursing practice, lifeworld
- MeSH terms
- Critical Care, Nursing Process, Philosophy, Nursing, Medical Laboratory Science
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review