The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Experiencing liver transplantation: a phenomenological approach
Abstract
Experiencing liver transplantation: a phenomenological approach In order to promote health, nurses and other health care professionals need to discover and articulate the meaning that is implicit in experiencing life after liver transplantation. From such an understanding, appropriate nursing interventions can be based. The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective experiences of the meaning of having a liver transplant, 1 year after the transplantation. After approval from the ethics committee at Göteborg University, 12 patients, nine women and three men, were interviewed. The study sample was chosen strategically to represent common diagnoses preceding liver transplantation. A phenomenological approach was chosen for the study. Analyses of the interviews were based on a modified version of a phenomenological method by Karlsson. Seven categories emerged: facing the inevitable; recapturing the body; emotional chaos; leaving the experts; family and friends; the threat of graft rejection; and honouring the donor. Having undergone a liver transplant meant living in a paradoxical situation. Knowing that you survived, it was a struggle to regain physical strength under great emotional stress. The recipients had to self‐administer life‐long medication, recognize symptoms indicating a potential problem and monitor for the possibility of graft rejection. Social support was essential for recovery. Meeting others with the same experience helped liver‐transplanted patients to deal with their identity crises as well as undergo a transformation from being utterly unique to a survivor among others. The clinical implications from this study are that interventions, such as patient education, and social and mental support, are important tools to optimize both self‐care capacity and the ability to maintain a healthy perception of identity after having a liver transplant at least up to 12 months post‐transplant.
Overview
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
In the citing paper
“In a number of studies, saturation is claimed, but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to ‘confirm’ (Jassim and Whitford 2014: p. 191; Forsberg et al. 2000: p. 328) or ‘validate’ (Vandecasteele et al. 2015: p. 2789) this claim”
From Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization (2018) · cites this paper as Forsberg et al. 2000
Citations
Cites
No references could be resolved yet.
Research works printed but not linked: 13
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x · DOI · Paper page
- 10.1023/A:1008849224815 · DOI
- Cohen M., 1987, A historical overview of the phenomenological movement, Image, 19, 31
- ColaizziP.(1978)Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. InExistential‐Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology(Valdale R. & King M. eds) Oxford University Press New York pp. 48–71.
- 10.1177/089801019701500309 · DOI
- 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130603.x · DOI
- 10.1002/lt.500040310 · DOI
- 10.7182/prtr.1.6.3.r735490753203252 · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1440-172X.1997.tb00107.x · DOI
- 10.1097/00044067-199308000-00002 · DOI
- 10.7182/prtr.1.6.3.ju46140jv0281483 · DOI
- 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20050861.x · DOI
- 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03107.x · DOI
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization
Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 · Cited by 12,033
“…of studies, saturation is claimed, but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to ‘confirm’ (Jassim and Whitford 2014: p. 191; Forsberg et al. 2000: p. 328) or ‘validate’ (Vandecasteele et al. 2015: p. 2789) this claim; for example: After the 10th interview, there were no…”
Background
Metadata
- Authors
- Forsberg, A., Bäckman, L., & Möller, A.
- Affiliations
- Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-08
- Volume
- 32
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 327-334
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2049012261
- Cited by
- 94
- References
- 0
- Citations by year
- 2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 1.85
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
- DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
- Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
- Keywords
- liver transplantation, patient experience, graft rejection, social support, identity crisis, self-care, patient education, emotional stress, post-transplant recovery, nursing interventions
- MeSH terms
- Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Body Image, Family, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Self Concept, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Liver Transplantation, Needs Assessment
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review