Cited by 94Organ Transplantation Techniques and OutcomesOrgan and Tissue Transplantation ResearchNursing care and research

The DOI matches its Crossref record.

Experiencing liver transplantation: a phenomenological approach

Forsberg, Anna, Bäckman, Lars, Möller, Anders·2000·Journal of Advanced Nursing

Abstract

Experiencing liver transplantation: a phenomenological approach In order to promote health, nurses and other health care professionals need to discover and articulate the meaning that is implicit in experiencing life after liver transplantation. From such an understanding, appropriate nursing interventions can be based. The aim of this study was to investigate the subjective experiences of the meaning of having a liver transplant, 1 year after the transplantation. After approval from the ethics committee at Göteborg University, 12 patients, nine women and three men, were interviewed. The study sample was chosen strategically to represent common diagnoses preceding liver transplantation. A phenomenological approach was chosen for the study. Analyses of the interviews were based on a modified version of a phenomenological method by Karlsson. Seven categories emerged: facing the inevitable; recapturing the body; emotional chaos; leaving the experts; family and friends; the threat of graft rejection; and honouring the donor. Having undergone a liver transplant meant living in a paradoxical situation. Knowing that you survived, it was a struggle to regain physical strength under great emotional stress. The recipients had to self‐administer life‐long medication, recognize symptoms indicating a potential problem and monitor for the possibility of graft rejection. Social support was essential for recovery. Meeting others with the same experience helped liver‐transplanted patients to deal with their identity crises as well as undergo a transformation from being utterly unique to a survivor among others. The clinical implications from this study are that interventions, such as patient education, and social and mental support, are important tools to optimize both self‐care capacity and the ability to maintain a healthy perception of identity after having a liver transplant at least up to 12 months post‐transplant.

Overview

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01480.x

Cites

Statistics

Recomputing p-values needs the paper’s full text.

Verification

Claims the paper makes

This paper’s full text isn’t openly available, so its claims and self-check weren’t run. The registry and citation checks still apply.

Claims other papers make about this one

Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?

Citations

Cites

No references could be resolved yet.

Research works printed but not linked: 13

  1. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1992.tb01859.x · DOI · Paper page
  2. 10.1023/A:1008849224815 · DOI
  3. Cohen M., 1987, A historical overview of the phenomenological movement, Image, 19, 31
  4. ColaizziP.(1978)Psychological research as the phenomenologist views it. InExistential‐Phenomenological Alternatives for Psychology(Valdale R. & King M. eds) Oxford University Press New York pp. 48–71.
  5. 10.1177/089801019701500309 · DOI
  6. 10.1034/j.1399-0012.1999.130603.x · DOI
  7. 10.1002/lt.500040310 · DOI
  8. 10.7182/prtr.1.6.3.r735490753203252 · DOI
  9. 10.1111/j.1440-172X.1997.tb00107.x · DOI
  10. 10.1097/00044067-199308000-00002 · DOI
  11. 10.7182/prtr.1.6.3.ju46140jv0281483 · DOI
  12. 10.1046/j.1365-2648.1994.20050861.x · DOI
  13. 10.1111/j.1365-2648.1995.tb03107.x · DOI

Cited by

Sorted by citations

  • Saturation in qualitative research: exploring its conceptualization and operationalization

    Saunders, B., Sim, J., Kingstone, T., Baker, S., Waterfield, J., Bartlam, B., Burroughs, H., & Jinks, C. (2018) · Quality & Quantity · doi:10.1007/s11135-017-0574-8 · Cited by 12,033

    “…of studies, saturation is claimed, but further data collection takes place in an apparent attempt to ‘confirm’ (Jassim and Whitford 2014: p. 191; Forsberg et al. 2000: p. 328) or ‘validate’ (Vandecasteele et al. 2015: p. 2789) this claim; for example: After the 10th interview, there were no…”
    Background

Metadata

Authors
Forsberg, A., Bäckman, L., & Möller, A.
Affiliations
Sahlgrenska University Hospital (SE)
Venue
Journal of Advanced Nursing
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-08
Volume
32
Issue
2
Pages
327-334
ISSN
  • 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2648
OpenAlex
W2049012261
Cited by
94
References
0
Citations by year
2026: 4 · 2025: 1 · 2024: 3 · 2023: 1 · 2022: 2 · 2021: 7 · 2020: 3 · 2018: 4 · 2017: 1 · 2016: 1 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 6 · 2013: 5 · 2012: 7
FWCI
1.85
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed
Locations
  • Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
  • PubMed (publishedVersion)
  • Lund University Publications (Lund University) (submittedVersion)
  • DigitalGeorgetown (Georgetown University Library) (submittedVersion)
Topics
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Surgery › Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
  • Health Sciences › Medicine › Transplantation › Organ and Tissue Transplantation Research
  • Health Sciences › Nursing › Research and Theory › Nursing care and research
Keywords
liver transplantation, patient experience, graft rejection, social support, identity crisis, self-care, patient education, emotional stress, post-transplant recovery, nursing interventions
MeSH terms
Activities of Daily Living, Adaptation, Psychological, Adult, Attitude to Health, Body Image, Family, Female, Health Promotion, Humans, Interpersonal Relations, Male, Middle Aged, Patient Education as Topic, Surveys and Questionnaires, Self Care, Self Concept, Social Support, Nursing Methodology Research, Liver Transplantation, Needs Assessment

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review