Promoting cognitive and metacognitive reflective reasoning skills in nursing practice: self‐regulated learning theory
Abstract
Background Effective clinical reasoning in nursing practice depends on the development of both cognitive and metacognitive skills. While a number of strategies have been implemented and tested to promote these skills, educators have not been able consistently to predict their development. Self-regulated learning theory suggests that this development requires concurrent attention to both the cognitive and metacognitive dimensions of reasoning in nursing care contexts. Aims This paper reports on a study to explore the impact of self-regulated learning theory on reflective practice in nursing, and to advance the idea that both cognitive and metacognitive skills support the development of clinical reasoning skills. Methods Integrative review of published literature in social science, educational psychology, nursing education, and professional education using the Cumulative Index to Nursing and Allied Health (CINAHL), Educational Resource Information Center (ERIC), and American Psychological Association (PsychInfo) Databases. The search included all English language articles with the key words clinical reasoning, cognition, critical thinking, metacognition, reflection, reflective practice, self-regulation and thinking. Findings Reflective clinical reasoning in nursing practice depends on the development of both cognitive and metacognitive skill acquisition. This skill acquisition is best accomplished through teaching-learning attention to self-regulation learning theory. A critica…
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
No citation lists for this paper
No citation lists for this paper yet — checked again daily.
References 122 · Cited by 405
- Authors
- Kuiper, R. A., & Pesut, D. J.
- Affiliations
- Indiana University (US)
- ORCID
- Pesut, Daniel J.
- Venue
- Journal of Advanced Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02
- Volume
- 45
- Issue
- 4
- Pages
- 381-391
- ISSN
- 0309-2402 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2648
- OpenAlex
- W2136353912
- Cited by
- 405
- References
- 122
- Citations by year
- 2026: 18 · 2025: 19 · 2024: 11 · 2023: 23 · 2022: 19 · 2021: 23 · 2020: 22 · 2019: 17 · 2018: 23 · 2017: 19 · 2016: 22 · 2015: 22 · 2014: 27 · 2013: 28 · 2012: 19
- FWCI
- 0.80
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Advanced Nursing (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Health Sciences › Medicine › Family Practice › Clinical Reasoning and Diagnostic Skills
- Social Sciences › Education › Reflective Practices in Education
- Social Sciences › Education › Education and Critical Thinking Development
- Keywords
- clinical reasoning, metacognition, reflective practice, critical thinking, nursing education, cognitive skills, self-regulation, nursing students, nursing practice
- MeSH terms
- Clinical Competence, Education, Nursing, Humans, Logic, Self-Assessment, Thinking
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review