The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Competition for early arrival in migratory birds
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. It is widely accepted that the arrival order of migratory birds is correlated with the condition of the birds, which leads to high quality individuals occupying prime sites. However, the theoretical backgrounds for this argument have been lacking. A simple game‐theoretic model of arrival timing is provided which investigates the evolutionary stability of condition‐dependent arrival order in territorial migrant birds. 2. Competition for territories or other priority‐dependent benefits can lead to arrival dates far preceding the cost‐minimizing date (the optimum date in the absence of competition) for all but the weakest individuals. Increasing the number of competitors can generate a ‘cascading’ competition for early arrival, which advances arrival dates further apart from the individual optimum dates for the onset of breeding. 3. At equilibrium, arrival order corresponds strictly to condition order only if marginal costs of advancing arrival are always larger for individuals in lower condition. If spring mortality vacates territories for later‐arriving birds, the criterion for ‘honest’ arrival order becomes still stricter: differential survival costs should exist, but survival differences among individuals (or, alternatively, territory quality differences) should not be very large. 4. If the habitat is saturated so that there is a risk of not obtaining a territory at all, or if worst territories are of much lower value than the rest, competition may lead to the majority of the population arriving within a fairly short interval, followed by a much later floating fraction. This synchrony in the arrival of breeders imposes an increasing cost for the lesser fit breeding birds. Thus, arrival costs paid are not necessarily highest for earliest arriving individuals, but for those who have the most to lose if they drop a few steps in the arrival order. 5. Competition for high quality territories can also lead to partial migration, in which case birds in good condition are expected to be most likely to remain resident.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Møller, A. P., Rubolini, D., & Lehikoinen, E. (2008) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.0803825105 · Cited by 768
Optimal bird migration revisited
Alerstam, T. (2011) · Journal of Ornithology · doi:10.1007/s10336-011-0694-1 · Cited by 425
Optimal annual routines: behaviour in the context of physiology and ecology
McNamara, J. M., & Houston, A. I. (2008) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.2007.2141 · Cited by 216
Sequential settlement and site dependence in a migratory raptor
Sergio, F., Blas, J., Forero, M. G., Donázar, J. A., & Hiraldo, F. (2007) · Behavioral Ecology · doi:10.1093/beheco/arm052 · Cited by 116
Metadata
- Authors
- Kokko, H.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-09
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 940-950
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2054731470
- Cited by
- 811
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 8.53
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00343.x
- The paper
- Kokko, H. (1999). Competition for early arrival in migratory birds. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00343.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.