The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Estimating the contributions of population density and climatic fluctuations to interannual variation in survival of Soay sheep
Abstract
Summary: 1. The relative importance of density‐dependent and ‐independent factors on interannual variation in over‐winter survival was investigated in the fluctuating population of Soay sheep on St Kilda, Scotland, over the period 1985–96. 2. Population density had a negative effect on survival in lambs and adult males while adult female survival showed no evidence of density dependence over the observed range of population densities. 3. Climatic fluctuations associated with the winter North Atlantic oscillation index (NAO) also affected survival, which decreased in winters that were relatively warm, wet and windy. The effect was most pronounced in lambs. 4. Survival was modelled using logistic regression analysis with and without year fitted as a random effect. The former incorporated stochastic year to year variation in survival. Results from the two modelling approaches were similar in terms of the regression coefficients estimated. However, the standard errors of the year‐dependent covariates, population size and NAO, were underestimated when the random year effect was ignored, leading to incorrect inferences about the relative significance of terms being made. 5. Using both modelling approaches, density dependence was found to have a greater influence on survival than the effect of NAO in lambs and adult males, whereas in adult females NAO was the more important. 6. Once random between‐year effects were taken into account, the individually varying terms such as body weight and faecal egg count were the most significant factors explaining differences in survival.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
McCullagh, P., & Nelder, J. A. (1989) · doi:10.1007/978-1-4899-3242-6 · Cited by 16,836
Peres, C. A., & Palacios, E. (2007) · Biotropica · doi:10.1111/j.1744-7429.2007.00272.x · Cited by 1,383
Cited by
Ecological responses to recent climate change.
Walther, G.-R., Post, E., Convey, P., Menzel, A., Parmesan, C., Beebee, T. J. C., Fromentin, J.-M., Hoegh-Guldberg, O., & Bairlein, F. (2002) · Nature · doi:10.1038/416389a · Cited by 9,975
Temporal Variation in Fitness Components and Population Dynamics of Large Herbivores
Gaillard, J.-M., Festa-Bianchet, M., Yoccoz, N. G., Loison, A., & Toïgo, C. (2000) · Annual Review of Ecology and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.31.1.367 · Cited by 1,729
The need for integrative approaches to understand and conserve migratory ungulates.
Bolger, D. T., Newmark, W. D., Morrison, T. A., & Doak, D. F. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2007.01109.x · Cited by 410
Mysterud, A., Stenseth, N. C., Yoccoz, N. G., Ottersen, G., & Langvatn, R. (2003) · Geophysical Monograph Series · doi:10.1029/134gm11 · Cited by 273
Lagged effects of ocean climate change on fulmar population dynamics
Thompson, P. M., & Ollason, J. C. (2001) · Nature · doi:10.1038/35096558 · Cited by 256
Metadata
- Authors
- Milner, J. M., Elston, D. A., & Albon, S. D.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-11
- Volume
- 68
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 1235-1247
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2013885957
- Cited by
- 204
- References
- 2
- FWCI
- 21.96
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Estimating the contributions of population density and climatic fluctuations to interannual variation in survival of Soay sheep. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00366.x
- The paper
- Milner, J. M., Elston, D. A., & Albon, S. D. (1999). Estimating the contributions of population density and climatic fluctuations to interannual variation in survival of Soay sheep. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.1999.00366.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.