The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Rabbits killing birds: modelling the hyperpredation process
Abstract
1. Introduced rabbits are known to have catastrophic effects on oceanic islands, either by direct destruction of the vegetative cover, or by the resulting disturbance of indigenous vertebrates. 2. Another dramatic effect, less well known, but potentially of major importance, is the hyperpredation process. This process, related to apparent competition, predicts that an introduced prey species, well adapted to high predation pressure, could induce the extinction of an indigenous prey, through the sudden increased population size of an introduced predator. In many island ecosystems, the simultaneous presence of introduced feral cats and rabbits is thus potentially a further threat for small vertebrates endemic of these islands. 3. Through a mathematical model, we tested this hypothesis, using a tri‐trophic system comprising an indigenous prey (birds), an introduced prey (rabbits) and an introduced predator (cats), and we demonstrated the theoretical existence of the hyperpredation process. 4. In addition, the numerical analysis of the model allowed a quantification of this process. It shows that the conditions required for an indigenous species to cope with the hyperpredation process imply very high intrinsic growth rates and/or carrying capacity, as well as behavioural anti‐predator response to the introduced predator. Since these conditions are unlikely to be met, this process is a further potential threat to most indigenous vertebrate prey. 5. Finally, our model shows that, although it can be induced by both types of adaptation together or alone, behavioural adaptations alone are more powerful in generating the hyperpredation process, than are life history traits adaptations.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Mammal invaders on islands: impact, control and control impact
COURCHAMP, F., CHAPUIS, J., & PASCAL, M. (2003) · Biological Reviews · doi:10.1017/s1464793102006061 · Cited by 1,067
Self-citationImpact of predation by domestic cats Felis catus in an urban area
BAKER, P. J., BENTLEY, A. J., ANSELL, R. J., & HARRIS, S. (2005) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2907.2005.00071.x · Cited by 254
Johnson, C. N., Isaac, J. L., & Fisher, D. O. (2007) · Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rspb.2006.3711 · Cited by 325
Diet of the introduced red fox Vulpes vulpes in Australia: analysis of temporal and spatial patterns
Fleming, P. A., Crawford, H. M., Stobo‐Wilson, A. M., Dawson, S. J., Dickman, C. R., Dundas, S. J., Gentle, M. N., Newsome, T. M., O’Connor, J., Palmer, R., et al. (2021) · Mammal Review · doi:10.1111/mam.12251 · Cited by 53
Metadata
- Authors
- Courchamp, F., Langlais, M., & Sugihara, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Animal Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 69
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 154-164
- ISSN
- 0021-8790 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2656
- OpenAlex
- W2010578828
- Cited by
- 248
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 6.76
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Rabbits killing birds: modelling the hyperpredation process. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00383.x
- The paper
- Courchamp, F., Langlais, M., & Sugihara, G. (2000). Rabbits killing birds: modelling the hyperpredation process. Journal of Animal Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2656.2000.00383.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.