The DOI matches its Crossref record; 22 of the 22 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves
Open accessAbstract
Summary: 1. In this study we used species accumulation models to solve one of the most serious problems encountered when comparing species richness between different communities. The problem is how to compare data among inventories in which different methodologies or measures of sampling effort have been employed. The methods used here for bats may be applied to any other biological group. We fit two asymptotic models to species accumulation curves for bat inventories to evaluate local or within‐community diversity (alpha) and landscape diversity (gamma) in central Veracruz, Mexico. 2. Species accumulation models allow us to: (i) measure within‐inventory efficacy and completeness; (ii) obtain an estimate of species richness that is based on a standardized measure of sampling effort, which makes valid comparisons between inventories possible; and (iii) estimate the minimum sampling effort required to reach a satisfactory level of completeness. 3. The applied models fit well in all cases (r2 > 0·95). The linear dependence model predicted lower asymptotes and the Clench model predicted higher asymptotes than the observed species richness. These models are useful as predictors representing the lower and upper limits between which the true species richness value should lie. 4. Alpha diversity for bats in all vegetation communities (11–18 species) was lower than the gamma diversity (20 species), suggesting that species richness and the sampling effort required are related to environmental heterogeneity. 5. We propose that 90% of the total fauna predicted by either of the models is an acceptable standardized value for comparing species richness between communities. 6. We assessed the within‐inventory completeness as the proportion of the models’ asymptote, where 90% is the desired minimum level of completeness. Except in palm stands, all bat inventories had an acceptable level of completeness, at least for the linear dependence model. 7. For conditions similar to those of our study area, the minimum effort required to obtain a satisfactory level of completeness is 5–18 nights for plant communities and 18 nights for more heterogeneous landscapes. 8. We make recommendations for improving the efficacy and completeness of bat surveys based on the application of species accumulation models.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Estimating terrestrial biodiversity through extrapolation
Colwell, R. K., & Coddington, J. A. (1994) · Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B: Biological Sciences · doi:10.1098/rstb.1994.0091 · Cited by 4,530
Indicators for Monitoring Biodiversity: A Hierarchical Approach
NOSS, R. F. (1990) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1523-1739.1990.tb00309.x · Cited by 3,151
Neotropical rainforest mammals: a field guide
(1991) · Choice Reviews Online · doi:10.5860/choice.28-2735 · Cited by 1,445
Neotropical rainforest mammals: A field guide
Ayres, J. (1991) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/0169-5347(91)90062-3 · Cited by 873
The Use of Species Accumulation Functions for the Prediction of Species Richness
SoberónM., J., & LlorenteB, J. (1993) · Conservation Biology · doi:10.1046/j.1523-1739.1993.07030480.x · Cited by 821
Morphology, Echolocation and Resource Partitioning in Insectivorous Bats
Aldridge, H. D. J. N., & Rautenbach, I. L. (1987) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4947 · Cited by 580
Kunz, T., & Racey, P. A. (1998) · Cited by 497
Surveying Natural Populations: Quantitative Tools for Assessing Biodiversity
Hayek, L.-A. C., & Buzas, M. A. (2010) · Columbia University Press eBooks · doi:10.7312/haye14620 · Cited by 495
The Role of Habitat Complexity and Heterogeneity in Structuring Tropical Mammal Communities
August, P. V. (1983) · Ecology · doi:10.2307/1937504 · Cited by 486
Biodiversity: A Biology of Numbers and Difference
Lennon, J., & Gaston, K. J. (1997) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/6031 · Cited by 444
Cited by
Using extended‐duration audio recordings to survey avian species
Tegeler, A. K., Morrison, M. L., & Szewczak, J. M. (2012) · Wildlife Society Bulletin · doi:10.1002/wsb.112 · Cited by 49
Metadata
- Authors
- Moreno, C. E., & Halffter, G.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-02
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 149-158
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2051741409
- Cited by
- 366
- References
- 22
- FWCI
- 10.38
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x
- The paper
- Moreno, C. E., & Halffter, G. (2000). Assessing the completeness of bat biodiversity inventories using species accumulation curves. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00483.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.