The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The impacts of non‐native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control
Open accessAbstract
1. The introduction of non‐native species continues to cause ecological concern globally, but there have been no published reviews of their effects in the UK. Impacts in the UK are therefore reviewed, along with current legislation and guidelines relating to the introduction and control of such species. 2. A large number of non‐native species have been introduced to the UK, both deliberately and accidentally, but only a small number of introduced non‐native species have established and caused detrimental ecological impacts. However, general declines in UK biodiversity, and the potential effects of future climate change, may increase the susceptibility of ecosystems to invasions. 3. Detrimental impacts of non‐native species on native biota have occurred through competition, predation, herbivory, habitat alteration, disease and genetic effects (i.e. hybridization). There are potential effects on genetic biodiversity as well as species biodiversity. 4. Several high profile examples highlight the technical difficulties, and financial implications, of removing an introduced species once it is established. Few UK control or eradication programmes have been successful. 5. Control might be more feasible if ‘problem’ species could be identified at an earlier stage of establishment. However, the poor success of attempts to characterize invasive species and predict which will have negative impacts highlight the individual and unpredictable nature of invasions. The difficulties of making general predictions suggest that every proposed species introduction should be subject to rigorous ecological characterization and risk assessment prior to introduction. 6. The plethora of UK legislation and guidelines developed to reduce impacts of non‐native species only go part of the way towards ameliorating impact. Many species already established in the wild might cause future problems. Illegal releases and escapes of non‐native species may augment feral populations or establish new colonies. While regulation of imports and releases is important, further enforcement of existing legislation and action against unlicensed releases is necessary.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Impact of invasive plants on the species richness, diversity and composition of invaded communities
Hejda, M., Pyšek, P., & Jarošík, V. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01480.x · Cited by 1,172
Current knowledge on non‐native freshwater fish introductions
Gozlan, R. E., Britton, J. R., Cowx, I., & Copp, G. H. (2010) · Journal of Fish Biology · doi:10.1111/j.1095-8649.2010.02566.x · Cited by 852
Sequence locally, think globally: the Darwin Tree of Life Project
The Darwin Tree of Life Project Consortium, Blaxter, M., Mieszkowska, N., Di Palma, F., Holland, P., Durbin, R., Richards, T., Berriman, M., Kersey, P., Hollingsworth, P., et al. (2022) · Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences · doi:10.1073/pnas.2115642118 · Cited by 562
Smith, R. M., Thompson, K., Hodgson, J. G., Warren, P. H., & Gaston, K. J. (2006) · Biological Conservation · doi:10.1016/j.biocon.2005.10.045 · Cited by 448
Thomas, C. D. (2011) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2011.02.006 · Cited by 411
Metadata
- Authors
- Manchester, S. J., & Bullock, J. M.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-10
- Volume
- 37
- Issue
- 5
- Pages
- 845-864
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W2001411022
- Cited by
- 484
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 11.02
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The impacts of non‐native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00538.x
- The paper
- Manchester, S. J., & Bullock, J. M. (2000). The impacts of non‐native species on UK biodiversity and the effectiveness of control. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2000.00538.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.