The DOI matches its Crossref record.
Large−scale disturbances, biological control and the dynamics of gorse populations
Open accessAbstract
Summary: Simulation and analytical models were developed for gorse Ulex europaeus. The simulation model incorporated spatially local density−dependent competition, disturbance, asymmetric competition between seedlings and established plants, a seed bank, local seed dispersal, an age structured established plant population, and temporal variation in the probability of disturbance. The analytical models were simple approximations of the simulation. The models extended our previously published model for Scotch broom Cytisus scoparius to include large−scale disturbances and possible management options, such as the use of fire, herbicides and oversowing with perennial grasses. Fire was assumed to influence established plant mortality, seed survival in the seed bank, and the probability of germination. We reviewed published data on the demography of gorse in New Zealand, the current management techniques, and the ongoing biological control programme. Over a wide range of biologically reasonable parameter values, the analytical models accurately predicted the outcome of the simulations. The analytical models worked well, providing gorse occupied a high proportion of the available sites and large−scale disturbances did not occur too frequently. The potential impact of seed−feeding biological control agents on gorse abundance was assessed, using the models, for several environmental and management scenarios. In particular, we explored how large−scale disturbance, such as fire and herbicide application, influences the outcome of biological control. The success of a biological control programme was found to depend critically on the frequency and intensity of disturbance, whether disturbed sites became suitable for recruitment, and the effects of disturbance on germination and seed mortality. The models highlight the need to manage recruitment opportunities carefully in order to maximize the effect of biological control agents. The models also indicate that details of plant population biology can have a profound effect on the success of any management strategy.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Jack of all trades, master of some? On the role of phenotypic plasticity in plant invasions
Richards, C. L., Bossdorf, O., Muth, N. Z., Gurevitch, J., & Pigliucci, M. (2006) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2006.00950.x · Cited by 1,456
HIERRO, J. L., MARON, J. L., & CALLAWAY, R. M. (2005) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.0022-0477.2004.00953.x · Cited by 836
The evolutionary consequences of biological invasions
SUAREZ, A. V., & TSUTSUI, N. D. (2008) · Molecular Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-294x.2007.03456.x · Cited by 338
Introduced species as evolutionary traps
Schlaepfer, M. A., Sherman, P. W., Blossey, B., & Runge, M. C. (2005) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2005.00730.x · Cited by 316
Plant invasions in New Zealand: global lessons in prevention, eradication and control
Hulme, P. E. (2020) · Biological Invasions · doi:10.1007/s10530-020-02224-6 · Cited by 122
Metadata
- Authors
- Rees, M., & Hill, R. L.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2001-04
- Volume
- 38
- Issue
- 2
- Pages
- 364-377
- ISSN
- 0021-8901 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2664
- OpenAlex
- W1963983389
- Cited by
- 353
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 21.57
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- bronze
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large−scale disturbances, biological control and the dynamics of gorse populations. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00598.x
- The paper
- Rees, M., & Hill, R. L. (2001). Large−scale disturbances, biological control and the dynamics of gorse populations. Journal of Applied Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2664.2001.00598.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.