The DOI matches its Crossref record.
The seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in beef cattle, dairy cattle and calves
Abstract
The epidemiology of clinical cases of campylobacter in temperate climates shows a striking seasonality. In the search for a seasonal environmental reservoir changes in the carriage rate and population size of campylobacters in bovine hosts with time have been measured. Most probable number (MPN) methodology was used to enumerate thermophilic campylobacters in samples taken from the small intestines of beef cattle at slaughter and the fresh faeces of four dairy herds and new-born calves. Statistical analyses revealed significant evidence for seasonal periodicity in the data from dairy herds (P = 0.044). Not only was there a departure from constancy within a 12-month interval but these data revealed a true seasonality, that is, the same periodicity in numbers from one year to the next. Each herd had two peaks per year, in approximately spring and autumn. Peaks coincided in herds on neighbouring farms but those on farms in the north preceded those on farms in the south by 2 and 1 months, respectively (P = 0.0057). Intestinal carriage by beef cattle at slaughter was 89.4% (n = 360) with an average MPN campylobacters per gram fresh weight (MPN gfw-1) of 6.1 x 10(2). Average MPN gfw-1 in faeces from the dairy herds and calves were 69.9 (S.D. 3) and 3.3 x 10(4) (S.D. 1.7 x 10(2)). There was no evidence of seasonal periodicity in the size of the campylobacter population in beef cattle at slaughter. Calves were campylobacter free at birth but became colonized with a few days.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cited by
Global Epidemiology of Campylobacter Infection
Kaakoush, N. O., Castaño-Rodríguez, N., Mitchell, H. M., & Man, S. M. (2015) · Clinical Microbiology Reviews · doi:10.1128/cmr.00006-15 · Cited by 1,529
Campylobacters as zoonotic pathogens: A food production perspective
Humphrey, T., O'Brien, S., & Madsen, M. (2007) · International Journal of Food Microbiology · doi:10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2007.01.006 · Cited by 733
Soller, J. A., Schoen, M. E., Bartrand, T., Ravenscroft, J. E., & Ashbolt, N. J. (2010) · Water Research · doi:10.1016/j.watres.2010.06.049 · Cited by 517
Campylobacters in water, sewage and the environment
Jones, K. (2001) · Journal of Applied Microbiology · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2672.2001.01355.x · Cited by 275
Self-citationKnowledge gaps in control of Campylobacter for prevention of campylobacteriosis
Hansson, I., Sandberg, M., Habib, I., Lowman, R., & Engvall, E. O. (2018) · Transboundary and Emerging Diseases · doi:10.1111/tbed.12870 · Cited by 172
Metadata
- Authors
- Stanley, K. N., Wallace, J. S., Currie, J. E., Diggle, P. J., & Jones, K.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 1998-09
- Volume
- 85
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 472-480
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W2042399832
- Cited by
- 207
- References
- 0
- FWCI
- 13.12
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in beef cattle, dairy cattle and calves. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.853511.x
- The paper
- Stanley, K. N., Wallace, J. S., Currie, J. E., Diggle, P. J., & Jones, K. (1998). The seasonal variation of thermophilic campylobacters in beef cattle, dairy cattle and calves. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.1998.853511.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.