The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine: W. L. COCHRAN Et al.
Abstract
Pseudomonas aeruginosa attached to alginate gel beads in sparse, thin biofilms exhibited reduced susceptibility to monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide compared with planktonic cells of the same micro-organism. Disinfection rate coefficients for planktonic bacteria averaged 0.551 mg(-1)min(-1) for monochloramine and 3.1 x 10(-4)l mg(-1) min(-1) for hydrogen peroxide. The corresponding values for 24-h-old biofilm cells were 0.291 mg min(-1) and 9.2 x 10(-5) 1 mg(-1) min(-1) for monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide, respectively. Several pieces of evidence support the interpretation that the reduced susceptibility of biofilm was not due simply to inadequate delivery of the antimicrobial agent to the local environment of the attached cells. No correlation between biofilm susceptibility and biofilm initial areal cell density was observed. Rapid delivery of hydrogen peroxide to the attachment surface, and subsequently to the interior, of the alginate gel beads was visualized by a direct experimental technique. Theoretical analysis of unsteady diffusion and diffusion reaction interactions also argued against any significant delay or barrier to antimicrobial or oxygen delivery. It was hypothesized that new genes are expressed when bacteria attach to a surface and begin to form a biofilm and that some of the resulting gene products reduce the susceptibility of the cell to antimicrobial agents including oxidative biocides such as monochloramine and hydrogen peroxide.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
The Involvement of Cell-to-Cell Signals in the Development of a Bacterial Biofilm
Davies, D. G., Parsek, M. R., Pearson, J. P., Iglewski, B. H., Costerton, J. W., & Greenberg, E. P. (1998) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.280.5361.295 · Cited by 3,396
Cited by
Mechanisms of biofilm resistance to antimicrobial agents
Mah, T.-F. C., & O'Toole, G. A. (2001) · Trends in Microbiology · doi:10.1016/s0966-842x(00)01913-2 · Cited by 3,921
Sharma, S., Mohler, J., Mahajan, S. D., Schwartz, S. A., Bruggemann, L., & Aalinkeel, R. (2023) · Microorganisms · doi:10.3390/microorganisms11061614 · Cited by 993
Kouidhi, B., Al Qurashi, Y. M. A., & Chaieb, K. (2015) · Microbial Pathogenesis · doi:10.1016/j.micpath.2015.02.007 · Cited by 180
Khot, P. D., Suci, P. A., Miller, R. L., Nelson, R. D., & Tyler, B. J. (2006) · Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy · doi:10.1128/aac.00997-06 · Cited by 104
Metadata
- Authors
- Cochran, W. L., McFeters, G. A., & Stewart, P. S.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2001-12-25
- Volume
- 88
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 22-30
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W1877416461
- Cited by
- 197
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 3.26
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine: W. L. COCHRAN Et al. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00825.x
- The paper
- Cochran, W. L., McFeters, G. A., & Stewart, P. S. (2001). Reduced susceptibility of thin Pseudomonas aeruginosa biofilms to hydrogen peroxide and monochloramine: W. L. COCHRAN Et al. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2000.00825.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.