Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 337

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation

Christofi, N., Ivshina, I.B.·2002·Journal of Applied Microbiology

Abstract

Introduction, 915–916 Surfactants, 916–917 Microorganisms and characteristics of biosurfactants produced, 917–918 Isolation of xenobiotic-degrading microorganisms with biosurfactant-producing capabilities, 918–919 Xenobiotics in soil, 919 Sorption of xenobiotics, 919 Biodegradation, 919–920 Surfactants and bioremediation, 920 Biosurfactants and organic solubilization and degradation, 920–921 Biosurfactants and metal solubilization, 921–923 Laboratory and field studies using Rhodococcus biosurfactants, 923–925 Conclusions, 925–926 Acknowledgements, 926 References, 926–929 The degree of association of organic and inorganic pollutants is governed by the complex physico-chemical interactions at interfaces. This association involves sorption onto soil constituents, sequestration within the soil matrix (micropores) and partitioning in a nonaqueous phase liquid (NAPL) that will, ultimately, control the fate of the contaminants. NAPL represents organic substances that are relatively insoluble in water providing a long-term source of pollutant. They represent a continuous input into the water phase to replace degraded or dissipating concentrations. As a result the bioavailability of contaminants to biodegradation may be reduced (Ogram et al. 1985; Miller and Alexander 1991). The enhancement of natural biological degradation processes, in what is termed bioremediation, can be a preferred cost-effective method of removing contaminants from soil-contaminated and other contaminated environments. The role of microorganisms has been shown to be essential in the remediation of, at least, organic pollution, and the activity of microbial types naturally present can be enhanced by bioremediation techniques which include increased aeration of the polluted material and nutrient additions (Christofi et al. 1998; Ivshina et al. 1998). Supplementing the source of microorganisms capable of degrading particular pollutants (bioaugmentation) and the enhancement of the desorption of pollutants from particulates using surfactants can increase hydrocarbon degradation (Deschenes et al. 1995; Thibault et al. 1996; Christofi et al. 1998; Ivshina et al. 1998). It is only 10–15 years that the use of surfactants in increasing the availability of hydrophobic pollutants in soils and other environments has been considered (Vigon and Rubin 1989). Previous studies have revealed that surfactants can enhance pollutant desorption and availability (Oberbremer et al. 1990; Zang and Miller 1992; Volkering et al. 1995; Rahman et al. 2002). They have been applied in oil washing for secondary oil recovery and to clean oil pipes and oil reservoirs (Osipow 1962). In desorption, both synthetic and natural (biological) surfactants have been used. However, it is not always the case that increasing the bioavailability of nonpolar organic substances through the use of surfactants leads to increased degradation or removal. Synthetic surfactants have also been shown to decrease organic degradation (Bruheim et al. 1999) possibly through, for example, the toxic effects of the surfactant (Rouse et al. 1994). It can also be assumed that increasing bioavailability of a pollutant can lead to an increasing toxicity to degrading microorganisms. It has been shown that sorption of toxicants is one major factor controlling bioavailability and toxicity (Welp and Brümmer 1998). In addition, the incorporation of the substrate within surfactant micelles can decrease once again its bioavailability, and, hence, reduce degradation rates. The use of biosurfactants in the control of the bioavailability of toxicants in soils and other environments is an attractive option because of their biodegradability (Herman et al. 1995). These surface-active compounds can be diverse with novel chemical structures and characteristics; they can be produced from cheap raw materials and the organisms producing them can be modified genetically to overproduce or produce new compounds. Additionally, they are significantly less toxic than synthetic petroleum-based surfactants (Banat et al. 2000). This review deals with microbial surfactant research, placing emphasis on the use of biosurfactants in remediation of contaminated soils outside the laboratory. It does not attempt to review the general use of surfactants in soil remediation or surfactant production by microorganisms. Mulligan et al. (2001b) covers the former while Lang (2002) deals with the latter. Surfactants are SURFace ACTive AgeNTS with wide ranging properties including the lowering of surface and interfacial tensions of liquids. Surface tension is defined as the free surface enthalpy per unit area (OECD 1995) and is the force acting on the surface of a liquid leading to minimization of the area of that surface. Both synthetic and natural surfactants exist capable of reducing the surface tension of water from 72 mN m−1 to around 27 mN m−1(Table 1). Biosurfactants are biological compounds that exhibit high surface-active properties (Georgiou e

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01774.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 337

Metadata

Authors
Christofi, N., & Ivshina, I. B.
Venue
Journal of Applied Microbiology
Published
2002-12
Volume
93
Issue
6
Pages
915-929
ISSN
  • 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2672
OpenAlex
W1966945668
Cited by
337
References
2
FWCI
4.01
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01774.x
The paper
Christofi, N., & Ivshina, I. B. (2002). Microbial surfactants and their use in field studies of soil remediation. Journal of Applied Microbiology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2672.2002.01774.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.