Suppression of Rhizoctonia solani diseases of sugar beet by antagonistic and plant growth-promoting yeasts
Abstract
AIMS: Isolates of Candida valida, Rhodotorula glutinis and Trichosporon asahii from the rhizosphere of sugar beet in Egypt were examined for their ability to colonize roots, to promote plant growth and to protect sugar beet from Rhizoctonia solani AG-2-2 diseases, under glasshouse conditions. METHODS AND RESULTS: Root colonization abilities of the three yeast species were tested using the root colonization plate assay and the sand-tube method. In the root colonization plate assay, C. valida and T. asahii colonized 95% of roots after 6 days, whilst Rhod. glutinis colonized 90% of roots after 8 days. Root-colonization abilities of the three yeast species tested by the sand-tube method showed that roots and soils attached to roots of sugar beet seedlings were colonized to different degrees. Population densities showed that the three yeast species were found at all depths of the rhizosphere soil adhering to taproots up to 10 cm, but population densities were significantly (P < 0.05) greater in the first 4 cm of the root system compared with other root depths. The three yeast species, applied individually or in combination, significantly (P < 0.05) promoted plant growth and reduced damping off, crown and root rots of sugar beet in glasshouse trials. The combination of the three yeasts (which were not inhibitory to each other) resulted in significantly (P < 0.05) better biocontrol of diseases and plant growth promotion than plants exposed to individual species. CONCLUSIONS: Isolates of C. valida, Rhod. glutinis and T. asahii were capable of colonizing sugar beet roots, promoting growth of sugar beet and protecting the seedlings and mature plants from R. solani diseases. This is the first successful attempt to use yeasts as biocontrol agents against R. solani which causes root diseases. SIGNIFICANCE AND IMPACT OF THE STUDY: Yeasts were shown to provide significant protection to sugar beet roots against R. solani, a serious soil-borne root pathogen. Yeasts also have the potential to be used as biological fertilizers.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Claims the paper makes
Claims other papers make about this one
Each is checked against this paper’s own text: does it say what the citing paper says it does?
Candida valida, Rhodotorula glutinis and Trichosporon asahii protected sugar beet against the soil pathogen Rhizoctonia solani.
“Candida valida, Rhodotorula glutinis and Trichosporon asahii protected sugar beet against the soil pathogen Rhizoctonia solani [38].”
From Competition assays and physiological experiments of soil and phyllosphere yeasts identify Candida subhashii as a novel antagonist of filamentous fungi (2017) · cites this paper as [38]
Cites
Wisniewski, M., Biles, C., Droby, S., McLaughlin, R., Wilson, C., & Chalutz, E. (1991) · Physiological and Molecular Plant Pathology · doi:10.1016/0885-5765(91)90033-e · Cited by 274 · see citing works
Flagged first, then by citations
Cited by
Sorted by citations
Indole-3-acetic acid-producing yeasts in the phyllosphere of the carnivorous plant Drosera indica L
Sun, P.-F., Fang, W.-T., Shin, L.-Y., Wei, J.-Y., Fu, S.-F., & Chou, J.-Y. (2014) · PLoS ONE · doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0114196 · Cited by 141 · see citing works
Hilber-Bodmer, M., Schmid, M., Ahrens, C. H., & Freimoser, F. M. (2017) · BMC Microbiology · doi:10.1186/s12866-016-0908-z · Cited by 106 · see citing works
“Candida valida, Rhodotorula glutinis and Trichosporon asahii protected sugar beet against the soil pathogen Rhizoctonia solani [38].”
BackgroundAlbertini, J., Rocha, R. K., Bastos, R. G., Ceccato-Antonini, S. R., & Rosa-Magri, M. M. (2022) · 3 Biotech · doi:10.1007/s13205-022-03322-z · Cited by 5 · see citing works
- Authors
- El-Tarabily, K. A.
- Affiliations
- United Arab Emirates University (AE)
- Corresponding author
- El-Tarabily, K.A.
- ORCID
- El-Tarabily, K.A.
- Venue
- Journal of Applied Microbiology
- Publisher
- Oxford University Press (OUP)
- Published
- 2004-01
- Volume
- 96
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 69-75
- ISSN
- 1364-5072 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2672
- OpenAlex
- W1992904613
- Cited by
- 152
- References
- 1
- Citations by year
- 2026: 7 · 2025: 5 · 2024: 7 · 2023: 16 · 2022: 13 · 2021: 14 · 2020: 11 · 2019: 11 · 2018: 7 · 2017: 10 · 2016: 3 · 2015: 5 · 2014: 5 · 2013: 8 · 2012: 7
- FWCI
- 2.37
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
- Locations
- Journal of Applied Microbiology (publishedVersion)
- PubMed (publishedVersion)
- Topics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant-Microbe Interactions and Immunity
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Plant Disease Resistance and Genetics
- Life Sciences › Agricultural and Biological Sciences › Plant Science › Mycorrhizal Fungi and Plant Interactions
- Keywords
- sugar beet, biological control, antagonistic yeasts, plant growth-promoting yeasts, Rhodotorula glutinis, Trichosporon asahii, root colonization, rhizosphere colonization, damping-off, crown rot, root rot, biofertilizers
- MeSH terms
- Antibiosis, Candida, Plant Diseases, Rhizoctonia, Rhodotorula, Soil Microbiology, Trichosporon, Plant Roots, Beta vulgaris
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review