Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 218

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 2 of the 2 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Large scale patterns and trophic structure of southern African rocky shores: the roles of geographic variation and wave exposure

Bustamante, Rodrigo, Branch, George·1996·Journal of Biogeography

Abstract

In this study we revise the biogeographic delimitation, and large‐scale patterns of community structure of the intertidal rocky shores of southern Africa. We use binary (presence/absence) and per‐species biomass data collected at fifteen localities and thirty‐seven different rocky sites, encompassing the shores of southern Namibia, South Africa and southern Mozambique. Multivariate analyses revealed that the shores of southern Africa (south of 25°) can be divided into three main biogeographic provinces: the west coast or Namaqua province, the south coast or Agulhas province and the east coast or Natal province. The biomass structure of the intertidal rocky shores communities of southern Africa varied at a large scale, corresponding to biogeographic differences, while local‐scale variation accorded with the intensity of local wave action. The average biomass of west coast communities was on average significantly greater than that of the south and east provinces. At a local scale, the community biomass on exposed shores was an order of magnitude greater than on sheltered shores, within all biogeographic provinces. Semi‐exposed shores exhibited intermediate average biomass. The trophic structure of these communities varied significantly with wave action: autotrophs, filter‐feeders and invertebrate predators were more prevalent on wave exposed than sheltered shores, whereas grazers were more abundant on sheltered and semi‐exposed shores. Exposed shores were consistently dominated by far fewer species than semi‐exposed and sheltered shores, independently of biogeographic differences. Within all biogeographic provinces semi‐exposed and sheltered shores were more diverse than exposed shores. West coast intertidal communities therefore had high levels of biomass, but were consistently species‐poor. Several working hypotheses that could explain these large and small‐scale patterns are presented.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.00026.x

Cites

2 of 2 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 2 references

Cited by

See all 218

Metadata

Authors
Bustamante, R., & Branch, G.
Venue
Journal of Biogeography
Publisher
Wiley
Published
1996-05
Volume
23
Issue
3
Pages
339-351
ISSN
  • 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2699
OpenAlex
W2171789617
Cited by
218
References
2
FWCI
1.45
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
closed

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Large scale patterns and trophic structure of southern African rocky shores: the roles of geographic variation and wave exposure. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.00026.x
The paper
Bustamante, R., & Branch, G. (1996). Large scale patterns and trophic structure of southern African rocky shores: the roles of geographic variation and wave exposure. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.1996.00026.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.