The DOI matches its Crossref record; 1 of the 1 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical ranges
Abstract
Aim We examined the range contraction of 309 declining species of animals and plants to determine if the contraction dynamics better matched predictions based on the demographic characteristics of historical populations (demographic hypothesis) or based on the contagion‐like spread of extinction forces (contagion hypothesis). Location Species included in the analysis came from all biogeographic regions. Methods We obtained range maps for 309 species from literature or through personal correspondence with authorities. Hypotheses were contrasted by examining the sequence of changes in the proportion (C) of the remnant range that fell within the central region of the historical range. Monte Carlo simulations and polynomial regressions were employed to examine changes in C during the process of range contraction. Results The results of the Monte Carlo simulations indicated that more species had observed range contractions consistent with the contagion hypothesis than expected by chance (z‐score = 2.922,P = 0.002). The Monte Carlo analysis also indicated that the number of species whose observed range contractions were consistent with the demographic hypothesis was no greater than expected by chance (z‐score = 0.337,P = 0.367). The results of the polynomial regression analysis for the two most common taxonomic groups (mammals and birds) and for all geographical regions (Australia, Africa, Eurasia, and North America) we examined also supported the contagion hypothesis. Main conclusions Most of the examined range contractions are consistent with the contagion hypothesis and that the most likely contagion is human related disturbance. These results have important implications for the conservation of endangered species.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Directions in Conservation Biology
Caughley, G. (1994) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/5542 · Cited by 2,405
Cited by
Elevation gradients of species‐density: historical and prospective views
Lomolino, M. V. (2001) · Global Ecology and Biogeography · doi:10.1046/j.1466-822x.2001.00229.x · Cited by 1,297
Self-citationMammal Population Losses and the Extinction Crisis
Ceballos, G., & Ehrlich, P. R. (2002) · Science · doi:10.1126/science.1069349 · Cited by 968
Range Contractions of North American Carnivores and Ungulates
LALIBERTE, A. S., & RIPPLE, W. J. (2004) · BioScience · doi:10.1641/0006-3568(2004)054[0123:rconac]2.0.co;2 · Cited by 528
Moving beyond assumptions to understand abundance distributions across the ranges of species
Sagarin, R. D., Gaines, S. D., & Gaylord, B. (2006) · Trends in Ecology & Evolution · doi:10.1016/j.tree.2006.06.008 · Cited by 507
Range contractions of the world's large carnivores
Wolf, C., & Ripple, W. J. (2017) · Royal Society Open Science · doi:10.1098/rsos.170052 · Cited by 419
Metadata
- Authors
- Channell, R., & Lomolino, M. V.
- Venue
- Journal of Biogeography
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2000-01
- Volume
- 27
- Issue
- 1
- Pages
- 169-179
- ISSN
- 0305-0270 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2699
- OpenAlex
- W2084971933
- Cited by
- 259
- References
- 1
- FWCI
- 10.46
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical ranges. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00382.x
- The paper
- Channell, R., & Lomolino, M. V. (2000). Trajectories to extinction: spatial dynamics of the contraction of geographical ranges. Journal of Biogeography. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2699.2000.00382.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.