The DOI matches its Crossref record; 34 of the 34 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses’ opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting
Abstract
Background. Many researchers have explored the barriers to research uptake in order to overcome them and identify strategies to facilitate research utilization. However, the research–practice gap remains a persistent issue for the nursing profession. Aims and objectives. The aim of this study was to gain an understanding of perceived influences on nurses’ utilization of research, and explore what differences or commonalities exist between the findings of this research and those of studies that have been conducted in various countries during the past 10 years. Design. Nurses were surveyed to elicit their opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization. The instrument comprised a 29‐item validated questionnaire, titled Barriers to Research Utilisation Scale (BARRIERS Scale), an eight‐item scale of facilitators, provision for respondents to record additional barriers and/or facilitators and a series of demographic questions. Method. The questionnaire was administered in 2001 to all nurses (n = 761) working at a major teaching hospital in Melbourne, Australia. A 45% response rate was achieved. Results. Greatest barriers to research utilization reported included time constraints, lack of awareness of available research literature, insufficient authority to change practice, inadequate skills in critical appraisal and lack of support for implementation of research findings. Greatest facilitators to research utilization reported included availability of more time to review and implement research findings, availability of more relevant research and colleague support. Conclusion. One of the most striking features of the findings of the present study is that perceptions of Australian nurses are remarkably consistent with reported perceptions of nurses in the US, UK and Northern Ireland during the past decade. Relevance to clinical practice. If the use of research evidence in practice results in better outcomes for our patients, this behoves us, as a profession, to address issues surrounding support for implementation of research findings, authority to change practice, time constraints and ability to critically appraise research with conviction and a sense of urgency.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Tabachnick, B. G., & Fidell, L. S. (1983) · Cited by 79,866
Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn't
Sackett, D. L., Rosenberg, W. M. C., Gray, J. A. M., Haynes, R. B., & Richardson, W. S. (1996) · BMJ · doi:10.1136/bmj.312.7023.71 · Cited by 15,769
An Index of Factorial Simplicity
Kaiser, H. F. (1974) · Psychometrika · doi:10.1007/bf02291575 · Cited by 14,898
Evidence-Based Medicine: A New Approach to Teaching the Practice of Medicine
Guyatt, G. (1992) · JAMA · doi:10.1001/jama.1992.03490170092032 · Cited by 4,202
Gluesing, J. C. (2012) · Leadership in Science and Technology: A Reference Handbook · doi:10.4135/9781412994231.n14 · Cited by 3,210
Barriers: The barriers to research utilization scale
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80052-7 · Cited by 583
Barriers to using research evidence in nursing practice
Retsas, A. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01315.x · Cited by 424
Barriers to using research findings in practice: The clinician's perspective
Funk, S. G., Champagne, M. T., Wiese, R. A., & Tornquist, E. M. (1991) · Applied Nursing Research · doi:10.1016/s0897-1897(05)80062-x · Cited by 347
Barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization among nurses in Northern Ireland
Parahoo, K. (2000) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.2000.01256.x · Cited by 329
Kajermo, K. N., Nordström, G., Krusebrant, Å., & Björvell, H. (1998) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1046/j.1365-2648.1998.00614.x · Cited by 284
Cited by
Chaudoir, S. R., Dugan, A. G., & Barr, C. H. (2013) · Implementation Science · doi:10.1186/1748-5908-8-22 · Cited by 800
Brown, C. E., Wickline, M. A., Ecoff, L., & Glaser, D. (2009) · Journal of Advanced Nursing · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2648.2008.04878.x · Cited by 470
Lyons, C., Brown, T., Tseng, M. H., Casey, J., & McDonald, R. (2011) · Australian Occupational Therapy Journal · doi:10.1111/j.1440-1630.2010.00900.x · Cited by 73
Metadata
- Authors
- Hutchinson, A. M., & Johnston, L.
- Venue
- Journal of Clinical Nursing
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 2004-02-16
- Volume
- 13
- Issue
- 3
- Pages
- 304-315
- ISSN
- 0962-1067 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2702
- OpenAlex
- W1985765065
- Cited by
- 307
- References
- 34
- FWCI
- 32.84
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses’ opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00865.x
- The paper
- Hutchinson, A. M., & Johnston, L. (2004). Bridging the divide: a survey of nurses’ opinions regarding barriers to, and facilitators of, research utilization in the practice setting. Journal of Clinical Nursing. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2702.2003.00865.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.