The DOI matches its Crossref record; 47 of the 47 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.
The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta‐analysis
Abstract
Summary: 1 We used data from 35 independently published studies world‐wide to analyse the effects of plant litter on the germination, establishment, species richness and above‐ground biomass of plants. Overall, the short‐term effects of litter on vegetation were mostly negative, although their magnitude varied with vegetation variable, study method, experimental duration, latitude, habitat, type and quantity of litter and target species. 2 Species richness was more affected than above‐ground biomass by litter, suggesting that litter may play a direct role in structuring plant communities as well as influencing competition in productive habitats. Litter had a stronger overall effect on plant germination than on establishment, suggesting that a litter‐reducing disturbance will have more effect early in the growth season. 3 On average, vegetation was more affected by litter in field than in glasshouse studies and during 2‐year than during 1‐year studies. The effect on biomass switched from negative after 1 year to positive after 3 years. 4 The absolute effects of litter on germination and establishment decreased and the absolute effects on above‐ground biomass increased with latitude. Ecosystem type also influenced the effects significantly. 5 Vegetation was generally more depressed by higher litter quantities. Litter composed of forbs and tree leaves had a stronger effect on vegetation than grass litter. The impact of a certain type of litter may therefore be related to its decomposition rate. 6 Tree species were more affected than forbs and grasses by litter, at least at the colonization stage.
Overview
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Integrity signals
Registry
Cites
Statistics
Verification
Claims the paper makes
The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.
Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.
Self-check
Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.
The self-check needs the paper’s full text.
Citations
Cites
Plant Strategies and Vegetation Processes
Grime, J. P. (1979) · Andalas University Repository (Andalas University) · Cited by 5,371
Resource Competition and Community Structure.
Harper, J. L., & Tilman, D. (1983) · The Journal of Ecology · doi:10.2307/2259756 · Cited by 4,180
Resource Competition and Community Structure
Hassell, M. P., & Tilman, D. (1984) · The Journal of Animal Ecology · doi:10.2307/4549 · Cited by 4,176
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Howel, D., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1995) · Biometrics · doi:10.2307/2533295 · Cited by 3,642
A General Hypothesis of Species Diversity
Huston, M. (1979) · The American Naturalist · doi:10.1086/283366 · Cited by 3,390
Biodiversity and stability in grasslands
Tilman, D., & Downing, J. A. (1994) · Nature · doi:10.1038/367363a0 · Cited by 2,119
The Handbook of Research Synthesis.
Light, R. J., Cooper, H., & Hedges, L. V. (1994) · Journal of the American Statistical Association · doi:10.2307/2291021 · Cited by 1,868
Aerts, R. (1997) · Oikos · doi:10.2307/3546886 · Cited by 1,786
Plant litter: Its dynamics and effects on plant community structure
Facelli, J. M., & Pickett, S. T. A. (1991) · The Botanical Review · doi:10.1007/bf02858763 · Cited by 1,543
Plant strategies and vegetation processes
Goodall, D. W. (1980) · Landscape Planning · doi:10.1016/0304-3924(80)90019-2 · Cited by 1,537
Cited by
Biodiversity and Litter Decomposition in Terrestrial Ecosystems
Hättenschwiler, S., Tiunov, A. V., & Scheu, S. (2005) · Annual Review of Ecology, Evolution, and Systematics · doi:10.1146/annurev.ecolsys.36.112904.151932 · Cited by 1,674
Plant–soil feedbacks: a meta‐analytical review
Kulmatiski, A., Beard, K. H., Stevens, J. R., & Cobbold, S. M. (2008) · Ecology Letters · doi:10.1111/j.1461-0248.2008.01209.x · Cited by 983
Gómez‐Aparicio, L. (2009) · Journal of Ecology · doi:10.1111/j.1365-2745.2009.01573.x · Cited by 512
Gurevitch, J., Curtis, P. S., & Jones, M. H. (2001) · Advances in Ecological Research · doi:10.1016/s0065-2504(01)32013-5 · Cited by 421
Direct and indirect control of grassland community structure by litter, resources, and biomass
Lamb, E. G. (2008) · Ecology · doi:10.1890/07-0393.1 · Cited by 141
Metadata
- Authors
- Xiong, S., & Nilsson, C.
- Venue
- Journal of Ecology
- Publisher
- Wiley
- Published
- 1999-12
- Volume
- 87
- Issue
- 6
- Pages
- 984-994
- ISSN
- 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
- 1365-2745
- OpenAlex
- W2034608543
- Cited by
- 558
- References
- 47
- FWCI
- 6.36
- Type
- journal article
- Language
- en
- Open access
- closed
About these checks
Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.
Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.
Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.
What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›
Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review
How to cite
Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.
- This page
- CoChat. (2026). Citation check: The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta‐analysis. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00414.x
- The paper
- Xiong, S., & Nilsson, C. (1999). The effects of plant litter on vegetation: a meta‐analysis. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.1999.00414.x
Data sources
Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.
Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).
Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.