Student or educator? Sign up with your school email and get 6 months of Pro free.
Cited by 306

The DOI matches its Crossref record; 46 of the 46 references it cites were found in a registry or an index.

Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea

Open access
Kéry, Marc, Matthies, Diethart, Spillmann, Hans‐Heinrich·2000·Journal of Ecology

Abstract

Summary: 1 We studied reproduction and offspring performance in relation to population size in the declining self‐incompatible perennials Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. In both species, reproduction was strongly reduced in small populations, where plants produced fewer seeds per fruit and per plant. Total seed mass per plant was higher in large populations, but individual seeds were smaller, indicating a trade‐off between seed number and size. Reproduction was depressed most strongly in populations consisting of less than c.200 (P. veris) and c.500 plants (G. lutea), respectively. 2 The inclusion of plant size (an integrated measure of habitat quality) in the statistical models did not change the relationships between fecundity and population size. Pollen limitation or inbreeding depression in small populations are therefore more likely explanations for these patterns than is habitat quality. 3 Germination rate and survival of seedlings in a common environment was not related to population size in either species, although P. veris developed into larger rosettes when seeds were derived from large populations. This suggests that inbreeding depression occurs in small populations of P. veris. 4 In a factorial fertilizer‐by‐competition experiment with P. veris, offspring from larger populations grew significantly larger and responded more strongly to fertilizer. For this declining species genetic deterioration as a result of habitat fragmentation may therefore aggravate the effects of environmental changes such as habitat eutrophication. 5 Our results suggest that small populations may face an increased short‐term risk of extinction because of reduced reproduction, and an increased long‐term risk because they are less able to respond to environmental changes.

Overview

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Integrity signals

Registry

Crossref · 10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00422.x

Cites

46 of 46 references verified0 citation errors · 0 not checkable

Statistics

Verification

Claims the paper makes

The claims and statistics of this paper haven’t been checked yet.

Run the check — free, no account needed. It reads the open-access text and checks the sources it cites.

A few free checks a day · papers already verified open instantly · results are public

Self-check

Percentages, sums and reported differences re-computed from the paper’s own numbers.

The self-check needs the paper’s full text.

Citations

Cites

Show all 46 references

Cited by

See all 306

Metadata

Authors
Kéry, M., Matthies, D., & Spillmann, H.
Venue
Journal of Ecology
Publisher
Wiley
Published
2000-02
Volume
88
Issue
1
Pages
17-30
ISSN
  • 0022-0477 (ISSN-L)
  • 1365-2745
OpenAlex
W2059689186
Cited by
306
References
46
FWCI
17.80
Type
journal article
Language
en
Open access
bronze

About these checks

Registry, retraction, Cites and statistics results are computed, not judged, with one exception: a printed reference that no index lists is read once by a model before it counts as a citation error. Claims are extracted by a model and kept only when their quote appears verbatim in the text; each cited source is then checked, with a model’s help, for whether it says what the claim relies on. Those verdicts can be wrong — read the claim’s quote and the cited source before relying on one.

Statistics and arithmetic are recomputed, not judged.

Confidence bands are shown only for fields calibrated on our annotated test set. None is calibrated yet, so no band is shown.

What counts as a claim ›How we measure confidence ›How we check this ›

Are you an author, or do you see a problem with this page? Request a review

How to cite

Cite CoChat for the checks on this page, and the paper for its own findings.

This page
CoChat. (2026). Citation check: Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. https://app.cochat.ai/papers/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00422.x
The paper
Kéry, M., Matthies, D., & Spillmann, H. (2000). Reduced fecundity and offspring performance in small populations of the declining grassland plants Primula veris and Gentiana lutea. Journal of Ecology. https://doi.org/10.1046/j.1365-2745.2000.00422.x

Data sources

Bibliographic data: Semantic Scholar, OpenAlex, Crossref.

Contains information from the Semantic Scholar Academic Graph Datasets, made available under the ODC Attribution License (ODC-BY 1.0).

Semantic Scholar’s data is described in: Kinney, R., et al. (2023). The Semantic Scholar Open Data Platform. arXiv:2301.10140.